C.F.R. » Title 18 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER E—REGULATIONS UNDER NATURAL GAS ACT › PART 154—RATE SCHEDULES AND TARIFFS › Subpart B—Form and Composition of Tariff

18 C.F.R. § 154.102

Requirements for filing rate schedules and tariffs

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All rates schedules, tariffs, and service agreements may be filed either by dividing the rate schedule, tariff, or agreement into individual tariff sheets, or tariff sections, or as an entire document except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.

(b) Open access transportation tariffs must be filed either as individual sheets or sections. If filed as sections, each section must include only material of related subject matter and must be of reasonable length and must include at a minimum a section for each item listed in the table of contents under § 154.103 of this section and each topic listed under General Terms and Conditions of Service.

(c) Individual negotiated rate agreements, non-conforming service agreements, or other agreements that are included in the tariff may be filed as entire documents.

(d) The first section or sheet of the tariff must include:

(1) The FERC Gas Tariff Volume Number and Name of the Natural Gas Company, for example

FERC Gas Tariff Volume No. [ ] of [Name of Natural Gas Company]

(2) The name, title, address, telephone number, e-mail address and facsimile number of a person to whom communications concerning the tariff should be sent.

[Order 714, 73 FR 57534, Oct. 3, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1975–1999 · leading case: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (1985). · cites it 5× “See 18 CFR § 154.102 (1984). Although petitioner received higher gas prices pending review by the Commission, petitioner suspended any increase in royalties paid to the royalty owners because the higher price could be subject to recoupment by petitioner's customers.”
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman, 486 U.S. 717 (1988). · cites it 6× “Specifically, petitioner had on file with the FPC an undertaking *720 to comply with regulations, now codified at 18 CFR § 154.102 (1987), requiring petitioner to refund any ultimately unapproved increase plus interest at certain specified rates.”
Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 732 P.2d 1286 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 8× “Under its corporate undertaking, Phillips agreed to comply with the refunding provisions of 18 C.F.R. § 154.102 (1986), which sets forth the interest rates applicable to refunds.”
Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 567 P.2d 1292 (Kan. 1977). · cites it 3× “§ 717c(e), with interest at seven percent (7%) per annum from the date of receipt until September 18, 1970, and eight percent (8%) per annum thereafter until paid out, if the FPC did not approve the sales price.”
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co., 569 S.W.2d 480 (Tex. 1978). · cites it 2× “§ 717c(e); 18 C.F.R. § 154.102 . The FPC suspended a total of thirty-one proposed price increases relating to Phillips' interstate gas sales from the Panhandle Field.”
Sandoz v. Conoco, Inc. (In Re Delta Energy Resources, Inc.), 67 B.R. 8 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1986). · cites it 3× “-101(e), computed in pursuant to 18 CFR 154.102(c), of $15,086.93. LGS claims a total due it of $147,077.”
Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Triton Oil & Gas Corp., 750 F.2d 113 (D.C. Cir. 1984). · cites it 4× “598 and not the Commission’s general, higher rate of interest established in its regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 154.102 (c)(2) (1984), issued subsequent to Opinion No.”
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Gillman, 593 S.W.2d 152 (Tex. App. 1980). “18 C.F.R. § 154.102 (b)(1). 4 . See In re Hugoton-Anadarko Area Rate Case, 466 F.”
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Adams, 513 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1975). · cites it 4× “Congress has resolved this difficulty by allowing a pipeline company to increase its prices on its own initiative, subject to a five-month suspension period which may be imposed by the FPC, and subject to a duty to refund to its purchasers any portion of the increase that the…”
Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 679 P.2d 1159 (Kan. 1984). “In the present case, as in Shutts I, Phillips filed a corporate agreement and undertaking with the FPC, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 154.102 (c)(2) (1983), to refund, to Phillips’ purchasers of gas, with interest, the portion of the increased rates not approved by the FPC.”
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 196 F.3d 1264 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “101 (2)(e) (1993); see also 18 C.F.R. § 154.102 (c). “Compensation deferred is compensation reduced by the time value of money.”
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 763 F.2d 265 (7th Cir. 1985). “598 turned out to be unrealistic and the producers were allowed to raise them. By 1982 some Southern Louisiana gas was being sold for as much as $1.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— 18 C.F.R. § 154.102(c) — 1 case
Sandoz v. Conoco, Inc. (In Re Delta Energy Resources, Inc.), 67 B.R. 8 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1986). “-101(e), computed in pursuant to 18 CFR 154.102(c), of $15,086.93. LGS claims a total due it of $147,077.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.