C.F.R. » Title 18 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER B—REGULATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT › PART 4—LICENSES, PERMITS, EXEMPTIONS, AND DETERMINATION OF PROJECT COSTS › Subpart I—Application for Preliminary Permit; Amendment and Cancellation of Preliminary Permit

18 C.F.R. § 4.80

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 4.80 through 4.83 pertain to preliminary permits under Part I of the Federal Power Act. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit is to secure priority of application for a license for a water power project under Part I of the Federal Power Act while the permittee obtains the data and performs the acts required to determine the feasibility of the project and to support an application for a license.

[Order 54, 44 FR 61336, Oct. 25, 1979, as amended by Order 413, 50 FR 11685, Mar. 25, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–2003 · leading case: Marseilles Land & Water Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 345 F.3d 916 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marseilles Land & Water Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 345 F.3d 916 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “18 C.F.R. § 4.80 (b)(l)(i). In the Commission’s view, Hydro Power’s filing is a competing development application, because it is an application for a license that would use the same resources that would be used by the project considered by Land Company’s then-pending preliminary…”
Jordan v. Randolph Mills, Inc., 29 B.R. 398 (M.D.N.C. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 797 (f); 18 C.F.R. §§ 4.80 -.83 (April 1, 1980). His permit applications dealt strictly with those dams.”
Jordan v. Randolph Mills, Inc., 716 F.2d 1053 (4th Cir. 1983). “Pursuant to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Rules, Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 4.80 , et seq., in April 1980 Jordan filed on behalf of Sellers Manufacturing applications for preliminary permits which would enable Sellers to study and appraise the potential of the…”
Mine Reclamation Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 30 F.3d 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “See 18 C.F.R. § 4.80 . More relevant to our mootness analysis, § 24 of the Act provides: Any lands of the United States included in any proposed project under the provisions of this subchapter shall from the date of the filing of application therefor be reserved from entry,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.