19 C.F.R. § 133.26

Demand for redelivery of released merchandise

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If it is determined that merchandise which has been released from CBP custody is subject to the restrictions of § 133.21, § 133.22 or § 133.23 of this subpart, an authorized CBP official shall promptly make demand for the redelivery of the merchandise under the terms of the bond on CBP Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, in accordance with § 141.113 of this chapter. If the merchandise is not redelivered to CBP custody, a claim for liquidated damages shall be made in accordance with § 141.113(h) of this chapter.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999; CBP Dec. 12-10, 77 FR 24380, Apr. 24, 2012; CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2020 · leading case: Iccs Usa Corp. v. United States, 357 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Iccs Usa Corp. v. United States, 357 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). · cites it 2× “See 19 C.F.R. §§ 133.26 , 13 141.113(d). 14 In this case, CBP issued the redelivery notice on the basis that the goods contained a counterfeit certification mark, in violation of 19 U.”

Iccs USA Corp. v. United States, 952 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 19 C.F.R. §§ 133.26 , 141.113(d). In this case, Customs issued the redelivery no- tice on the basis that the merchandise contained a counter- feit certification mark in violation of § 1526(e).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.