19 C.F.R. § 134.11

Country of origin marking required

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless excepted by law, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), requires that every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States the English name of the country of origin of the article, at the time of importation into the Customs territory of the United States. Containers of articles excepted from marking shall be marked with the name of the country of origin of the article unless the container is also excepted from marking.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1995–2017 · leading case: Sociedad Anonima Viña Santa Rita v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 193 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2001).
Sociedad Anonima Viña Santa Rita v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 193 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 3× “” 19 C.F.R. § 134.11 ; see also 27 C.F.R. § 4.”
Helene Curtis v. Nat'l Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., 890 F. Supp. 152 (E.D.N.Y 1995). “19 C.F.R. § 134.11 . As such, the products are “misbranded,” see 21 U.”
United States v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes, 322 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (C.D. Cal. 2004). “§ 1304 (a) and 19 C.F.R. § 134.11 ; (4) the Cigarettes were in violation of the country of origin provisions of 15 U.”
Pentax Corp. v. Robison, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 486 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “§ 1304 (a) (1988); 19 C.F.R. § 134.11 (1991). An importer which has mis-marked the country of origin of imported merchandise is subject to additional duties of ten percent of the value of the merchandise imported.”
Santamarina v. Sears Roebuck & Co. CA2/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “11 provides that every article of foreign origin or its container shall be marked as “permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit.” It is fanciful to think most purchasers of Craftsman products retained the container or packaging of small items for years…”
Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply, Inc. (D.D.C. 2017). “at 6 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 134.11 (requiring “that every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.