19 C.F.R. § 141.64
Review and correction of entry and entry summary documentation
Entry and entry summary documentation may be reviewed before acceptance to ensure that all entry and statistical requirements are complied with and that the indicated values and rates of duty appear to be correct. If any errors are found, the entry and the entry summary documentation shall not be considered to have been filed in proper form and shall be returned to the importer for correction.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 772 F.3d 1281 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 772 F.3d 1281 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “, United States certificates of indebtedness, Treasury notes, or Treasury bills” in lieu of bonds), as well as 19 C.F.R. § 141.64 (providing for review and correction of entry documents).”
Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1450 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “See 19 C.F.R. § 141.64 (1984) (entry and entry summary documents found to contain errors “shall not be considered to have been filed in proper form and shall be returned to the importer for correction”).”
Aviall of Texas, Inc. v. United States, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 727 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “19 C.F.R. § 141.64 . Thus, assuming Customs argument is correct and the blanket certification is to be submitted at entry, Customs should have rejected the entries.”
Innotech Aviation Ltd. v. United States, 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 1392 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). “19 C.F.R. § 141.64 (1991); see also Aviall, 18 CIT at 735, 861 F.”
United States v. Anneri Izurieta, 471 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2012). “See 19 C.F.R. § 141.64 . The district court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Izurieta’s probation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.