19 C.F.R. § 152.24
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1981–1987 · leading case: Nike, Inc. v. Rubber Mfrs. Ass'n, 509 F. Supp. 912 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
Nike, Inc. v. Rubber Mfrs. Ass'n, 509 F. Supp. 912 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). “Customs and the Court of International Trade are uniquely qualified to resolve the legal and factual issues which Nike’s claims have raised: whether the certifications were false under 19 C.F.R. § 152.24 (c); whether the certifications, if false, were relied upon by Customs in…”
Hampshire Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 11 Ct. Int'l Trade 510 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). “(hereinafter "Servus”), a domestic footwear producer, sought to initiate an internal advice proceeding pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 152.24 (c)(5) (1986) to review the decision not to apply ASP to Ret-tinger’s imports.”
— 19 C.F.R. § 152.24(c) — 1 case
Hampshire Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 11 Ct. Int'l Trade 510 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). “(hereinafter "Servus”), a domestic footwear producer, sought to initiate an internal advice proceeding pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 152.24 (c)(5) (1986) to review the decision not to apply ASP to Ret-tinger’s imports.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.