C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 165—INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF EVASION OF ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES › Subpart C—Investigation Procedures

19 C.F.R. § 165.25

Verifications of information

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Prior to making a determination under § 165.27, CBP may in its discretion verify information in the United States or foreign countries collected under § 165.23 as is necessary to make its determination.

(b) CBP may conduct verifications before and after the deadline for the voluntary submission of new factual information as referenced in § 165.23. The general purpose of the verification is to verify the accuracy of the information already placed on the administrative record.

(c) CBP will place a report about the verification, i.e., the verification report, on the administrative record. CBP will require the party that underwent the verification to place verification exhibits on the administrative record. Verification exhibits will generally contain information compiled and verified by CBP at CBP's discretion during the verification. In accordance with § 165.4, both CBP and the party that underwent the verification will provide public versions of their verification documents, which will be served on all parties to the investigation. CBP will not accept voluntary submissions of new factual information at the verification after the deadline for voluntary submission of new factual information, as referenced in § 165.23. Parties to the investigation cannot submit rebuttal information to either CBP's verification report or the verification exhibits. Parties to the investigation may submit to CBP written arguments in relation to the verification report and/or its exhibits in accordance with § 165.26.

(d) If CBP determines that information discovered during a verification is relevant to the investigation and constitutes new factual information, CBP will place it on the administrative record separately, in accordance with § 165.23, and allow parties to the investigation to submit rebuttal information.

[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19260, Mar. 18, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 2020 CIT 171 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 2020 CIT 171 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020). · cites it 2× “Customs did not address Royal Brush’s due process arguments except to state that the information and findings contained in the verification report were “covered by” Customs’ regulation, 19 C.F.R. § 165.25 . Id. at 5 n.15. 13 On June 18, 2019, Royal Brush filed a request for an…”
Skyview Cabinet USA, Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 91 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 1517 (c)(2); see also 19 C.F.R. § 165.25 (a) (“Prior to making a determination .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.