19 C.F.R. § 172.33
Acceptance of offers in compromise
An offer in compromise will be considered accepted only when the offeror is so notified in writing. As a condition to accepting an offer in compromise, the offeror may be required to enter into any collateral agreement or to post any security which is deemed necessary for the protection of the interest of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–1993 · leading case: The United States of Am. v. The Cocoa Berkau, Inc., & Washington Int'l Ins. Co., 990 F.2d 610 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
The United States of Am. v. The Cocoa Berkau, Inc., & Washington Int'l Ins. Co., 990 F.2d 610 (Fed. Cir. 1993). “See 19 C.F.R. § 172.33 (1992). Mitigation proceedings pursuant to section 1623(c) are not analogous to the formal and time-consuming administrative proceedings which Congress permitted to toll the statute of limitations in the government contract setting.”
United States v. Peerless Ins., 703 F. Supp. 955 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “Peerless then petitioned for supplemental relief under 19 C.F.R. § 172.33 , asking Customs to cancel entirely all claims against Peerless because Customs’ requests for redelivery and the notice of liquidated damages may not have been delivered to the “now defunct Ferrari” and…”
Pope Prods., Div. of Purex v. United States, 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 279 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1991). “Because 19 C.F.R. § 172.33 requires that the petitioner pay the liquidated damages due in order to receive this additional administrative review, Pope enclosed a check for $35,973.”
Pope Prods., Div. of Purex v. United States, 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 484 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1991). “Pope tendered the monies sought with the second supplemental petition, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 172.33 (c)(1). The petition was denied by Customs on December 16, 1987.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.