19 C.F.R. § 174.0

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part deals with the administrative review of decisions of the port director and Center director, including the requirements for the filing of protests against such decisions, amendment of protests, review and accelerated disposition, and provisions dealing with further administrative review. Provisions applicable to Canadian and Mexican exporters and producers regarding administrative review and appeal of adverse marking decisions under the North American Free Trade Agreement are contained in part 181 of this chapter.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69472, Dec. 30, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. United States, 843 F. Supp. 728 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994).
Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. United States, 843 F. Supp. 728 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). · cites it 3× “First, as described in 19 C.F.R. § 174.0 , the scope of part 174 does not encompass decisions by the Office of Regulatory Audit such as the one underlying this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.