19 C.F.R. § 175.11

Filing of petitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Number of copies and where filed. All petitions pursuant to section 516 Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1516), shall be submitted to the Commissioner of Customs in triplicate.

(b) By whom filed. Petitions may be filed by the domestic interested parties themselves, or by duly authorized attorneys or agents on their behalf. A petition filed by a corporation shall be signed by an officer thereof, and petition filed by a partnership shall be signed by a member thereof.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13432, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–2002 · leading case: Rubie's Costume Co. v. United States, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002).
Rubie's Costume Co. v. United States, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002). “§ 1516 and 19 C.F.R. § 175.11 . On July 22, 1998, in response to Rubie’s petition, Customs issued Headquarter Ruling 961447 denying the petition for reclassification of the costumes under Chapter 61 or Chapter 62, HTSUS, as “wearing apparel” and affirming their classification…”
Flintkote Co. v. Blumenthal, 469 F. Supp. 115 (N.D.N.Y. 1979). “§§ 1582 (c), 2632(a); 19 C.F.R. § 175.11 (1978). One of the errors that Flintkote attributes to the ITC is that it based its decision upon a finding of lack of injury or likelihood of injury to the American cement industry as a whole rather than upon a finding with regard to…”
Allen Sugar Co., H & R Brokerage Div. v. Brady, 706 F. Supp. 49 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1989). “IV 1986) and 19 C.F.R. § 175.11 , asking Customs to reclassify blended sweetener products from edible preparations containing sugar, item 183.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.