19 C.F.R. § 201.12

Requests

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any party to a nonadjudicative investigation may request the Commission to take particular action with respect to that investigation. Such requests shall be filed by letter addressed to the Secretary, shall be placed by the Secretary in the record, and shall be served on all other parties. The Commission shall take such action or make such response as it deems appropriate.

[90 FR 233, Jan. 3, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States, 477 F. Supp. 201 (Cust. Ct. 1979).
Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States, 477 F. Supp. 201 (Cust. Ct. 1979). “See 19 C.F.R. 201.12(c) (1972). Fifth, the Commission’s Determination of Injury was not made solely upon the record made at the hearing but after considering all written submissions from interested parties, evidence adduced at the hearing, and all factual information obtained by…”
Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States, 68 C.C.P.A. 8 (C.C.P.A. 1980). “Any person who has entered an appearance in accordance with § 201.13 may, with the permission of the presiding officials, direct questions to the witness, but only for the purpose of assisting the Commission in obtaining relevant and material facts with respect to the subject…”
Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. United States, 566 F. Supp. 899 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “12(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 201.12(d)), it would be unnecessary to submit such a statement if a prehearing brief is submitted instead.”
— 19 C.F.R. § 201.12(c) — 1 case
Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States, 477 F. Supp. 201 (Cust. Ct. 1979). “See 19 C.F.R. 201.12(c) (1972). Fifth, the Commission’s Determination of Injury was not made solely upon the record made at the hearing but after considering all written submissions from interested parties, evidence adduced at the hearing, and all factual information obtained by…”
— 19 C.F.R. § 201.12(d) — 1 case
Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. United States, 566 F. Supp. 899 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “12(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 201.12(d)), it would be unnecessary to submit such a statement if a prehearing brief is submitted instead.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.