C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER II—UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—NONADJUDICATIVE INVESTIGATIONS › PART 207—INVESTIGATIONS OF WHETHER INJURY TO DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES RESULTS FROM IMPORTS SOLD AT LESS THAN FAIR VALUE OR FROM SUBSIDIZED EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES › Subpart C—Final Determinations, Short Life Cycle Products

19 C.F.R. § 207.27

Short life cycle products

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An eligible domestic entity may file a petition to establish a product category for short life cycle merchandise which has been the subject of two or more affirmative dumping determinations. The Commission shall within thirty (30) days of the filing of the petition determine its sufficiency. If the petition is found to be sufficient, the Commission shall institute a proceeding to establish a product category and publish a notice of institution in the Federal Register. Upon request of an interested person filed within fifteen (15) days after publication of the notice of institution, the Commission shall conduct a hearing which shall be transcribed. The Commission's determination concerning the scope of the product category into which to classify the short life cycle merchandise identified by the petition shall be issued no later than ninety (90) days after the filing of the petition.

(b) The Commission may on its own initiative and at any time modify the scope of a product category established in a proceeding pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. Ninety (90) days prior to such modification, the Commission shall publish a notice of proposed modification in the Federal Register. Upon request of an interested party filed within fifteen (15) days after publication of the notice of proposed modification, the Commission shall conduct a hearing which shall be transcribed. Written submissions concerning the proposed modification shall be accepted if filed no later than sixty (60) days after publication of the notice of proposed modification.

[56 FR 11928, Mar. 21, 1991. Redesignated at 61 FR 37832, July 22, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United States, 592 F. Supp. 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United States, 592 F. Supp. 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “§ 1677 (7)(A) (1982); 19 C.F.R. § 207.27 (1983). In making an injury determination, the Commission is required to consider, among other factors, the following: (i) the volume of imports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation; (ii) the effect of imports of…”
Nat'l Ass'n of Mirror Mfrs. v. United States, 696 F. Supp. 642 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “46 (1979); 19 C.F.R. § 207.27 (1988). In considering whether the domestic unfinished mirror industry was suffering material injury, the Commission found growth in many indicators of the domestic industry’s performance.”
British Steel Corp. v. United States, 593 F. Supp. 405 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “§ 1677 (7)(A) (1982); 19 C.F.R. § 207.27 (1983). In making an injury determination, the Commission is re *409 quired to consider, among other factors, the following: (i) the volume of imports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation; (ii) the effect of…”
Gifford-Hill Cement Co. v. United States, 615 F. Supp. 577 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “See also 19 C.F.R. § 207.27 (1983). The legislative history of the *586 provision suggests that it also pertains to the issue of causation.”
Wells Mfg. Co. v. United States, 677 F. Supp. 1239 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). “As the determination clearly provides, moreover, evidence of trade restrictive practices was only one of the factors considered by the ITC.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.