19 C.F.R. § 210.61

Discovery and compulsory process

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The presiding administrative law judge shall set all discovery deadlines. The administrative law judge's authority to compel discovery includes discovery relating to the following issues:

(a) Any matter relevant to the motion for temporary relief and the responses thereto, including the issues of bonding by the complainant; and

(b) The issues the Commission considers pursuant to sections 337 (e)(1), (f)(1), and (j)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930, viz.,

(1) The appropriate form of relief (notwithstanding the form requested in the motion for temporary relief),

(2) Whether the public interest precludes that form of relief, and

(3) The amount of the bond to be posted by the respondents to secure importations or sales of the subject imported merchandise while the temporary relief order is in effect. The administrative law judge may, but is not required to, make findings on the issues specified in sections 337 (e)(1), (f)(1), or (j)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Evidence and information obtained through discovery on those issues will be used by the parties and considered by the Commission in the context of the parties' written submissions on remedy, the public interest, and bonding by respondents, which are filed with the Commission pursuant to § 210.67(b).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1982–1982 · leading case: SSIH Equip. S.A. v. U.S. ITC & Stewart-Warner Corp., 69 C.C.P.A. 140 (C.C.P.A. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

SSIH Equip. S.A. v. U.S. ITC & Stewart-Warner Corp., 69 C.C.P.A. 140 (C.C.P.A. 1982). “10 We do not find 19 CFR 210.61, which has not been changed since the statute was amended, controlling.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.