C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER III—INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE › PART 351—ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES › Subpart A—Scope, Definitions, the Record of Proceedings, Cash Deposits, Nonmarket Economy Antidumping Rates, All-Others Rate, and Respondent Selection

19 C.F.R. § 351.101

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In general. This part contains procedures and rules applicable to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings under title VII of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.), and also determinations regarding cheese subject to an in-quota rate of duty under section 702 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 1202 note). This part reflects statutory amendments made by titles I, II, and IV of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Pub. L. 103-465, which, in turn, implement into United States law the provisions of the following agreements annexed to the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994; Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures; and Agreement on Agriculture.

(b) Countervailing duty investigations involving imports not entitled to a material injury determination. Under section 701(c) of the Act, certain provisions of the Act do not apply to countervailing duty proceedings involving imports from a country that is not a Subsidies Agreement country and is not entitled to a material injury determination by the Commission. Accordingly, certain provisions of this part referring to the Commission may not apply to such proceedings.

(c) Application to governmental importations. To the extent authorized by section 771(20) of the Act, merchandise imported by, or for the use of, a department or agency of the United States Government is subject to the imposition of countervailing duties or antidumping duties under this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2006 · leading case: Royal Thai Gov't v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Royal Thai Gov't v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “References to the countervailing duty regulations are to 19 C.F.R. §351.101 et seq. 4 . It is noteworthy that the Statement of Administrative Action (“SAA”) accompanying the URAA indicated that the new definition of financial contribution was intended to "encompass the types of…”
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United States, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “References to the countervailing duty regulations are to 19 C.F.R. § 351.101 et seq. 8 . Hynix contends that the 2001 presidential statement is suggestive only of a possible motive for the Korean government to intervene and does not indicate the formulation of an affirmative…”
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co. v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000). “7308, 7330, 7381 (1996) (codified at 19 C.F.R. § 351.101 et seq.) (proposed Feb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.