19 C.F.R. § 351.205

Preliminary determination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Introduction. A preliminary determination in an antidumping or countervailing duty investigation constitutes the first point at which the Secretary may provide a remedy (sometimes referred to as “provisional measures”) if the Secretary preliminarily finds that dumping or countervailable subsidization has occurred. Whether the Secretary's preliminary determination is affirmative or negative, the investigation continues. This section contains rules regarding deadlines for preliminary determinations, postponement of preliminary determinations, notices of preliminary determinations, and the effects of affirmative preliminary determinations.

(b) Deadline for preliminary determination. The deadline for a preliminary determination under section 703(b) or section 733(b) of the Act will be:

(1) Normally not later than 140 days in an antidumping investigation (65 days in a countervailing duty investigation) after the date on which the Secretary initiated the investigation (see section 703(b)(1) or section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Act);

(2) Not later than 190 days in an antidumping investigation (130 days in a countervailing duty investigation) after the date on which the Secretary initiated the investigation if the Secretary postpones the preliminary determination at petitioner's request or because the Secretary determines that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated (see section 703(c)(1) or section 733(c)(1) of the Act);

(3) In a countervailing duty investigation, not later than 250 days after the date on which the proceeding began if the Secretary postpones the preliminary determination due to an upstream subsidy allegation (up to 310 days if the Secretary also postponed the preliminary determination at the request of the petitioner or because the Secretary determined that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated) (see section 703(c)(1) and section 703(g)(1) of the Act);

(4) Within 90 days after initiation in an antidumping investigation, and on an expedited basis in a countervailing duty investigation, where verification has been waived (see section 703(b)(3) or section 733(b)(2) of the Act);

(5) In a countervailing duty investigation, on an expedited basis and within 65 days after the date on which the Secretary initiated the investigation if the sole subsidy alleged in the petition was the derogation of an international undertaking on official export credits (see section 702(b)(3) and section 703(b)(2) of the Act);

(6) In a countervailing duty investigation, not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary initiated the investigation if the only subsidy under investigation is a subsidy with respect to which the Secretary received notice from the United States Trade Representative of a violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement (see section 703(b)(5) of the Act); and

(7) In an antidumping investigation, within the deadlines set forth in section 733(b)(1)(B) of the Act if the investigation involves short life cycle merchandise (see section 733(b)(1)(B) and section 739 of the Act).

(c) Contents of preliminary determination and publication of notice. A preliminary determination will include a preliminary finding on critical circumstances, if appropriate, under section 703(e)(1) or section 733(e)(1) of the Act (whichever is applicable). The Secretary will publish in the Federal Register notice of “Affirmative (Negative) Preliminary Antidumping (Countervailing Duty) Determination,” including the rates, if any, and an invitation for argument consistent with § 351.309.

(d) Effect of affirmative preliminary determination. If the preliminary determination is affirmative, the Secretary will take the actions described in section 703(d) or section 733(d) of the Act (whichever is applicable). With respect to section 703(d)(1)(B) and 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act, the Secretary will normally order the posting of cash deposits to ensure payment if antidumping or countervailing duties ultimately are imposed. In making information available to the Commission under section 703(d)(3) or section 733(d)(3) of the Act, the Secretary will make available to the Commission and to employees of the Commission directly involved in the proceeding the information upon which the Secretary based the preliminary determination and which the Commission may consider relevant to its injury determination.

(e) Postponement at the request of the petitioner. A petitioner must submit a request for postponement of the preliminary determination (see section 703(c)(1)(A) or section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act) 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination, and must state the reasons for the request. The Secretary will grant the request, unless the Secretary finds compelling reasons to deny the request.

(f) Notice of postponement. (1) If the Secretary decides to postpone the preliminary determination at the request of the petitioner or because the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, the Secretary will notify all parties to the proceeding not later than 20 days before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination, and will publish in the Federal Register notice of “Postponement of Preliminary Antidumping (Countervailing Duty) Determination,” stating the reasons for the postponement (see section 703(c)(2) or section 733(c)(2) of the Act).

(2) If the Secretary decides to postpone the preliminary determination due to an allegation of upstream subsidies, the Secretary will notify all parties to the proceeding not later than the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and will publish in the Federal Register notice of “Postponement of Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determination,” stating the reasons for the postponement.

[62 FR 27379, May 19, 1997, as amended at 76 FR 61045, Oct. 3, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “207; 19 C.F.R. §§ 351.205 (a), 351.210(a). Such an order imposes a duty "in an amount equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price (or the constructed export price) for the merchandise.”
Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 3d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016). · cites it 4× “See 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (d) (instructing Commerce that the provisional- measures established in the statute is to take the form of cash deposits, rather than bond or other security).”
Belgium v. United States, 551 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 1673b(f); 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (c). Entries of imported goods before the publication date of Commerce's preliminary determination are generally not subject *1342 to antidumping duties, but entries after that date are subject to such duties.”
Decca Hosp. Furnishings, LLC v. United States, 427 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “Pursuant to this initial estimate, Commerce instructs the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to collect estimated duties, sometimes referred to as “cash deposits,” on entries of the merchandise that is subject to investigation.”
Nucor Corp. v. United States, 286 F. Supp. 3d 1364 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “Additionally, Commerce preliminarily assigned Dongbu's rate as the "all-others" rate because it was the only calculated non-de minimis rate.”
Shandong Dongfang Bayley Wood Co. v. United States, 2017 CIT 77 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “, 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (a) (“Whether the Secretary’s preliminary determination is affirmative or negative, the investigation continues.”
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States, 2015 CIT 71 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015). “The "preliminary determination in an [AD] duty investigation constitutes the first point at which [Commerce may require duties],” 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (a), here from the period of the First Administrative Review, AR1 Final Determination, 79 Fed.”
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. Hyosung D & P Co., 809 F.3d 626 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “§§ 1673, 1673d(e)(2); see 19 C.F.R. §§ 351.205 (a), 351.210(a). Specified determinations of Commerce and the Commission are reviewable in the Court of International Trade, 19 U.”
Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States, 2023 CIT 22 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). “§§ 1671f, 1673f, 1677¢; 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (d) (providing for importers to pay cash deposits higher than what is finally determined they owe, relying on subsequent mechanisms to return excess collections).”
Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. v. United States, 2025 CIT 74 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2025). “See 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (a) (providing that a preliminary determination is “the first point at which [Commerce] may provide a remedy (sometimes referred to as ‘provisional measures’) if [Commerce] Court No.”
Tau-Ken Temir LLP v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2025). “§ 1671b(b); 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (b)(1). During this time, Commerce may issue questionnaires to any person, including initial and supplemental questionnaires.”
Linyi Chengen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2026). “§ 1673b; see also 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 . Commerce then begins “verification,” a process that can involve visit- ing the facilities of a respondent and its relevant affiliates, and reviewing books and records, all in an effort to ensure the information that was provided in…”
— 19 C.F.R. § 351.205(d) — 1 case
Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 3d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016). “See 19 C.F.R. § 351.205 (d) (instructing Commerce that the provisional- measures established in the statute is to take the form of cash deposits, rather than bond or other security).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.