(a) Introduction. Section 751(b) of the Act provides for what is known as a “changed circumstances” review. This section contains rules regarding requests for changed circumstances reviews and procedures for conducting such reviews.
(b) Requests for changed circumstances review. At any time, an interested party may request a changed circumstances review, under section 751(b) of the Act, of an order or a suspended investigation. Within 45 days after the date on which a request is filed, the Secretary will determine whether to initiate a changed circumstances review.
(c) Limitation on changed circumstances review. Unless the Secretary finds that good cause exists, the Secretary will not review a final determination in an investigation (see section 705(a) or section 735(a) of the Act) or a suspended investigation (see section 704 or section 734 of the Act) less than 24 months after the date of publication of notice of the final determination or the suspension of the investigation.
(d) Procedures. If the Secretary decides that changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review exist, the Secretary will conduct a changed circumstances review in accordance with § 351.221.
(e) Time limits. The Secretary will issue final results of review (see § 351.221(b)(5)) within 270 days after the date on which the changed circumstances review is initiated, or within 45 days if all parties to the proceeding agree to the outcome of the review.
Notes of Decisions
Sahaviriya Steel Indus. Pub. Co. v. United States, 714 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010).
· cites it 2× “Invoking 19 C.F.R. § 351.216 (b), 3 U.S. Steel requested that Commerce initiate a changed circumstances review to reinstate the order with regard to SSI’s exports of subject merchandise to the United States.”
Itochu Bldg. Prods. v. United States, 2012 CIT 122 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
· cites it 2× “The Department’s regulations, in 19 C.F.R. § 351.216 (e), provide for an expedited issuance of final results, ie.”
Sahaviriya Steel Indus. Pub. Co. v. United States, 601 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009).
“” 19 C.F.R. § 351.216 (b). 2 . Further citations to the Tariff Act of 1930 are to the relevant provision in Title 19 of the United States Code, 2000 edition.”
Inmax Sdn. Bhd. v. United States, 2017 CIT 158 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).
“There is also a "parroting regulation,” 19 C.F.R. § 351.216 (c), that "does little more than restate the terms of the statute itself,” Gonzales v.”
Itochu Bldg. Prods. v. United States, 2014 CIT 37 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2014).
“§ 1675 (b); 19 C.F.R. §§ 351.216 , 351.221(c)(3).3 Mid Continent sought revocation of the Order as to these four types of nails on the ground that “the domestic industry no longer has an interest in maintaining the Order with respect these specific products.”
— 19 C.F.R. § 351.216(e) — 1 case
Itochu Bldg. Prods. v. United States, 2012 CIT 122 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
“The Department’s regulations, in 19 C.F.R. § 351.216 (e), provide for an expedited issuance of final results, ie.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.