20 C.F.R. § 10.323

What are the penalties for failing to report for or obstructing a second opinion or referee examination?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an employee refuses to submit to or in any way obstructs an examination required by OWCP, including testing such as functional capacity determinations conducted in connection with an OWCP-directed medical examination, his or her right to compensation under the FECA is suspended under 5 U.S.C. 8123(d) until such refusal or obstruction stops. The action of the employee's representative is considered to be the action of the employee for purposes of this section. The employee will forfeit compensation otherwise paid or payable under the FECA for the period of the refusal or obstruction, and any compensation already paid for that period will be declared an overpayment and will be subject to recovery pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8129.

(b) If the employee does not report for an OWCP-directed examination or in any way obstructs this examination, he or she may provide an explanation to OWCP within 14 days. If this explanation does not establish good cause for the employee's actions, entitlement to compensation will be suspended in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8123(d). Should the employee subsequently agree to attend the examination or cease the obstruction (as expressed in writing or by telephone documented on Form CA-110), OWCP will restore any periodic benefits to which the employee is entitled when the employee actually reports for and cooperates with the examination. Payment is retroactive to the date the employee agreed to attend or cease obstruction of the examination.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Nurriddin v. Acosta, 327 F. Supp. 3d 147 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Nurriddin v. Acosta, 327 F. Supp. 3d 147 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “323 (b) ("[E]ntitlement to compensation will be suspended" if the employee does not provide "good cause" for not reporting to, or otherwise obstructing, an "OWCP-directed examination."). He then submitted a response. Nurriddin Decl.”
Nurriddin v. Perez (D.D.C. 2018). “N; see also 20 C.F.R. § 10.323 (b) (“[E]ntitlement to compensation will be suspended” if the employee does not provide “good cause” for not reporting to, or otherwise obstructing, an “OWCP-directed examination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.