20 C.F.R. § 260.2

Initial decisions on the amount of service and compensation credited to an employee

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Within 30 days after receipt of a timely request by an employee for amendment with respect to the number of service months and amount of compensation credited to the employee by the Board under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, the Board shall appoint a qualified employee to make a determination with respect to such matter. The employee appointed by the Board shall promptly render a decision. Written notice of such decision shall be communicated to the employee within 30 days after such decision is made. Such decision shall include notification of the employee's right to reconsideration of the initial decision as provided in § 260.3. For purposes of this section, a timely request to amend an employee's record of service months and compensation maintained under the Railroad Retirement Act shall be filed within four years after the date on which the report of service months and compensation was required to be made to the Board by the employee's employer. See § 211.16 of this chapter.

[67 FR 77153, Dec. 17, 2002]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1980–1995 · leading case: Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board (1980) ca3 · cites it 3× “20 C.F.R. §§ 260.2 (e)(3), 262.12 (1979).”

Wilhelmina Pope v. Railroad Retirement Board Edwin Thrash v. Railroad Retirement Board (1982) cadc · cites it 4× “Although some of the annuitants were informed of their right to request a waiver, none were informed of their *974 right to appeal the board’s decision on overpayment through the administrative process, 20 C.F.R. §§ 260.2 , 260.3 (1977) and, ultimately, to a court of appeals, 45…”

Clinton T. Frock and Charles L. Stribling v. United States Railroad Retirement Board (1982) ca7 “20 C.F.R. §§ 260.2 , 260.3 (1977). Failure to file a final administrative appeal forfeited any right to further review of the decision.”

Anthony P. Abbruzzese v. Railroad Retirement Board (1995) ca10 “20 C.F.R. § 260.2 (b) (1972). The current regulation, and the 1994 version presumably applied by the Board when determining whether petitioner had shown good cause for reopening, limits the appeal window to sixty days, but allows for untimely review upon a showing of good cause.”

Wilhelmina Pope v. The Railroad Retirement Board Edwin Thrash v. The Railroad Retirement Board (1984) cadc “§ 231g; 20 C.F.R. §§ 260.2 , 260.4 (June 8, 1977).”

Mrs. Edna G. Scammerhorn v. Railroad Retirement Board of the United States of America (1984) ca5 “20 C.F.R. § 260.2 (b), (c) (1977). 3 . The evidence in the record conclusively demonstrates that Mrs.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.