C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart P—Determining Disability and Blindness

20 C.F.R. § 404.1519

The consultative examination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A consultative examination is a physical or mental examination or test purchased for you at our request and expense from a treating source or another medical source, including a pediatrician when appropriate. The decision to purchase a consultative examination will be made on an individual case basis in accordance with the provisions of §§ 404.1519a through 404.1519f. Selection of the source for the examination will be consistent with the provisions of § 404.1503a and §§ 404.1519g through 404.1519j. The rules and procedures for requesting consultative examinations set forth in §§ 404.1519a and 404.1519b are applicable at the reconsideration and hearing levels of review, as well as the initial level of determination.

[56 FR 36956, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 11875, Mar. 7, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 134 cases (47 in the last 5 years), 1964–2026 · leading case: Kacee Chandler v. Comm'r Soc. Sec., 667 F.3d 356 (3rd Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kacee Chandler v. Comm'r Soc. Sec., 667 F.3d 356 (3rd Cir. 2011). “Although reliance on State consultants’ and treating physicians’ opinions is common and ALJs are required to consider any existing State consultant reports, see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 , 404.1527(f), the regulations do not require ALJs to seek outside expert assistance, see 20 C.”
Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn Colvin, 758 F.3d 834 (7th Cir. 2014). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 , 416.919 (establishing such consultative examinations for applicants seeking, respectively, disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income).”
Cummings v. Colvin, 129 F. Supp. 3d 209 (W.D. Pa. 2015). “2011) (citing 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 , 404.1527(e), 404.”
Nadine Reed v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 270 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 2001). “” 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 , 416.919. Although referrals to consultative examiners may be made by the Social Security Administration (SSA), “[d]ay-to-day responsibility” for the consultative examination process rests not with the SSA but with cooperating State agencies.”
Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Sec'y Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 771 F.2d 682 (3rd Cir. 1985). “1506 (d) (1976) with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519 (c)(2) (1967) (amended by 40 Fed.”
Ray v. Astrue, 649 F. Supp. 2d 391 (E.D. Pa. 2009). “” 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 , 416.919. As part of the CE, the ALJ can also order diagnostic tests and procedures, unless they pose a risk to the claimant.”
Dykes Ex Rel. Brymer v. Barnhart, 112 F. App'x 463 (6th Cir. 2004). “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519 . 3 . The federal social security regulations provide that disability claims are evaluated through a five-step approach.”
Bruce B. Adams v. Caspar Weinberger, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 548 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1977). “Former 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519 (c)(2)(iii). See Marion v.”
Esther Marion, Guardian of James E. Marion, Incompetent v. John W. Gardner, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 359 F.2d 175 (8th Cir. 1966). · cites it 2× “This is 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519 (c) (2) (iii), 42 U.”
Hernandez v. Astrue, 814 F. Supp. 2d 168 (E.D.N.Y 2011). “1517 ; see also 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1519 ; 404.1519g. Under the regulations, the medical opinion of a treating physician or psychiatrist will be given “controlling” weight if that opinion “is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and…”
Thomas P. Osborne v. Wilbur Cohen, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 409 F.2d 37 (6th Cir. 1969). · cites it 2× “” [ 20 CFR § 404.1519 .] We are of the opinion that there was substantial evidence supporting the Secretary’s finding that the appellant was capable of engaging in substantial gainful work.”
Richards v. Colvin, 223 F. Supp. 3d 296 (M.D. Penn. 2016). “20 C.F.R. Section 404.1519(a)(b)(4) (2007); See also Robac-zewski v.”
Show all 134 citing cases →
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519(a)(1) — 1 case
Perkins v. Apfel, 101 F. Supp. 2d 365 (D. Maryland 2000).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519(a)(b)(4) — 1 case
Richards v. Colvin, 223 F. Supp. 3d 296 (M.D. Penn. 2016). “20 C.F.R. Section 404.1519(a)(b)(4) (2007); See also Robac-zewski v.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519(c) — 4 cases
Underwood v. Gardner, 267 F. Supp. 802 (W.D. Mo. 1967).
Jarrett v. Celebrezze, 233 F. Supp. 282 (W.D.S.C. 1964).
Cooney v. Finch, 300 F. Supp. 818 (W.D. Pa. 1969).
Branham v. Celebrezze, 245 F. Supp. 787 (E.D. Ky. 1965).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519(g) — 1 case
Bumpus v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (W.D.N.Y. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.