20 C.F.R. § 404.1545

Your residual functional capacity

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General—(1) Residual functional capacity assessment. Your impairment(s), and any related symptoms, such as pain, may cause physical and mental limitations that affect what you can do in a work setting. Your residual functional capacity is the most you can still do despite your limitations. We will assess your residual functional capacity based on all the relevant evidence in your case record. (See §§ 404.1512(d) through (e).)

(2) If you have more than one impairment. We will consider all of your medically determinable impairments of which we are aware, including your medically determinable impairments that are not “severe,” as explained in §§ 404.1520(c), 404.1521, and 404.1523, when we assess your residual functional capacity. (See paragraph (e) of this section.)

(3) Evidence we use to assess your residual functional capacity. We will assess your residual functional capacity based on all of the relevant medical and other evidence. In general, you are responsible for providing the evidence we will use to make a finding about your residual functional capacity. (See § 404.1512(c).) However, before we make a determination that you are not disabled, we are responsible for developing your complete medical history, including arranging for a consultative examination(s) if necessary, and making every reasonable effort to help you get medical reports from your own medical sources. (See §§ 404.1512(d) through (f).) We will consider any statements about what you can still do that have been provided by medical sources, whether or not they are based on formal medical examinations. (See § 404.1513.) We will also consider descriptions and observations of your limitations from your impairment(s), including limitations that result from your symptoms, such as pain, provided by you, your family, neighbors, friends, or other persons. (See paragraph (e) of this section and § 404.1529.)

(4) What we will consider in assessing residual functional capacity. When we assess your residual functional capacity, we will consider your ability to meet the physical, mental, sensory, and other requirements of work, as described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section.

(5) How we will use our residual functional capacity assessment. (i) We will first use our residual functional capacity assessment at step four of the sequential evaluation process to decide if you can do your past relevant work. (See §§ 404.1520(f) and 404.1560(b).)

(ii) If we find that you cannot do your past relevant work, you do not have any past relevant work, or if we use the procedures in § 404.1520(h) and § 404.1562 does not apply, we will use the same assessment of your residual functional capacity at step five of the sequential evaluation process to decide if you can adjust to any other work that exists in the national economy. (See §§ 404.1520(g) and 404.1566.) At this step, we will not use our assessment of your residual functional capacity alone to decide if you are disabled. We will use the guidelines in §§ 404.1560 through 404.1569a, and consider our residual functional capacity assessment together with the information about your vocational background to make our disability determination or decision. For our rules on residual functional capacity assessment in deciding whether your disability continues or ends, see § 404.1594.

(b) Physical abilities. When we assess your physical abilities, we first assess the nature and extent of your physical limitations and then determine your residual functional capacity for work activity on a regular and continuing basis. A limited ability to perform certain physical demands of work activity, such as sitting, standing, walking, lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling, or other physical functions (including manipulative or postural functions, such as reaching, handling, stooping or crouching), may reduce your ability to do past work and other work.

(c) Mental abilities. When we assess your mental abilities, we first assess the nature and extent of your mental limitations and restrictions and then determine your residual functional capacity for work activity on a regular and continuing basis. A limited ability to carry out certain mental activities, such as limitations in understanding, remembering, and carrying out instructions, and in responding appropriately to supervision, co-workers, and work pressures in a work setting, may reduce your ability to do past work and other work.

(d) Other abilities affected by impairment(s). Some medically determinable impairment(s), such as skin impairment(s), epilepsy, impairment(s) of vision, hearing or other senses, and impairment(s) which impose environmental restrictions, may cause limitations and restrictions which affect other work-related abilities. If you have this type of impairment(s), we consider any resulting limitations and restrictions which may reduce your ability to do past work and other work in deciding your residual functional capacity.

(e) Total limiting effects. When you have a severe impairment(s), but your symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings do not meet or equal those of a listed impairment in appendix 1 of this subpart, we will consider the limiting effects of all your impairment(s), even those that are not severe, in determining your residual functional capacity. Pain or other symptoms may cause a limitation of function beyond that which can be determined on the basis of the anatomical, physiological or psychological abnormalities considered alone; e.g., someone with a low back disorder may be fully capable of the physical demands consistent with those of sustained medium work activity, but another person with the same disorder, because of pain, may not be capable of more than the physical demands consistent with those of light work activity on a sustained basis. In assessing the total limiting effects of your impairment(s) and any related symptoms, we will consider all of the medical and nonmedical evidence, including the information described in § 404.1529(c).

[56 FR 57943, Nov. 14, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 51162, Aug. 26, 2003; 77 FR 10656, Feb. 23, 2012; 77 FR 43494, July 25, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10,735 cases (7,024 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2014).
Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “1996) (quoting 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)). 12 GHANIM V. COLVIN features.”
Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 247 F.3d 34 (3rd Cir. 2001). · cites it 4× “The SSA defines work as “light” when it involves lifting no more than 20 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 10 pounds.”
Cichocki v. Astrue, 729 F.3d 172 (2d Cir. 2013). · cites it 4× “, whether the claimant can perform sedentary, light, medium, heavy, or very heavy work), he “must first identify the individual’s functional limitations or restrictions and assess his or her work-related abilities on a function-by-function basis, including the functions in…”
Leslie Woods v. Kilolo Kijakazi, 32 F.4th 785 (9th Cir. 2022). · cites it 2× “’” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(2). A. The ALJ found that Woods can perform “light work” with frequent balancing, stooping, crouching, crawling, and reaching overhead, but only occasional climbing.”
Henningsen v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 111 F. Supp. 3d 250 (E.D.N.Y 2015). · cites it 9× “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(3). In addition, the Commissioner must consider the claimant’s “ability to meet the physical, mental, sensory, and other requirements of work.”
Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 245 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2001). · cites it 4× ““Residual functional capacity” (RFC) is defined as “what [the claimant] can still do” despite his or her “physical or mental limitations,” see 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a). The ALJ determined that Mr.”
Craft v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 668 (7th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a)(1); SSR 96-8p. It is based upon the medical evidence in the record and other evidence, such as testimony by the claimant or his friends and family.”
Bornette v. Barnhart, 466 F. Supp. 2d 811 (E.D. Tex. 2006). · cites it 8× “A Final Judgment will be entered separately, remanding this action to the Commissioner to consider all impairments; make a function-by-function assessment of plaintiffs residual functional capacity as required by Regulation 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (b) and Social Security Ruling…”
Russell Hess, III v. Comm'r Soc. Sec., 931 F.3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “" 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545 (a)(1), 416.945(a)(1) ; SSR 96-8P, at *2.”
Hans Schink v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “3d at 1440 (citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a) ). The ALJ makes this determination by considering a claimant's physical, mental, and other abilities affected by the impairment.”
Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 368 F. Supp. 3d 626 (S.D. Ill. 2019). · cites it 4× “" 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545 (a)(1), 416.945(a)(1).”
Robbins v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 466 F.3d 880 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “” See SSR 96-8p, 1996 WL 374184 , at *5; accord 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545 (a)(3), 416.945(a)(3).”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(4) — 1 case
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a) — 34 cases
Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 247 F.3d 34 (3rd Cir. 2001). “The SSA defines work as “light” when it involves lifting no more than 20 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 10 pounds.”
Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 245 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2001). ““Residual functional capacity” (RFC) is defined as “what [the claimant] can still do” despite his or her “physical or mental limitations,” see 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a). The ALJ determined that Mr.”
Crawford v. Astrue, 633 F. Supp. 2d 618 (N.D. Ill. 2009).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(1) — 68 cases
Walton v. Astrue, 773 F. Supp. 2d 742 (N.D. Ohio 2011).
Franklin Young v. Comm'r Soc. Sec., 519 F. App'x 769 (3rd Cir. 2013).
Ray v. Astrue, 649 F. Supp. 2d 391 (E.D. Pa. 2009).
Alice Sullivan v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 595 F. App'x 502 (6th Cir. 2014).
Engebrecht v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 572 F. App'x 392 (6th Cir. 2014).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(10) — 2 cases
Brill v. Saul (W.D. Mo. 2021).
Holdeman v. Saul (W.D. Mo. 2021).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(2) — 26 cases
Eaton v. Colvin, 180 F. Supp. 3d 1037 (S.D. Ala. 2016).
Pelt v. Saul (N.D. Ill. 2020).
Salus v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (N.D. Ind. 2021).
Dixon v. SSA (E.D. Ky. 2021).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(3) — 37 cases
DaSilva-Santos v. Astrue, 596 F. Supp. 2d 181 (D. Mass. 2009).
Aytch v. Astrue, 686 F. Supp. 2d 590 (E.D.N.C. 2010).
Steele v. Saul (N.D. Ill. 2020).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(4) — 2 cases
Wisnesky v. Kijakazi (S.D. Cal. 2024).
Scott v. Dudek (S.D.W. Va 2025).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(5)(i) — 1 case
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(b) — 27 cases
Nance v. Barnhart, 194 F. Supp. 2d 302 (D. Del. 2002).
Mateer v. Bowen, 702 F. Supp. 220 (S.D. Iowa 1988).
Dunbar v. Barnhart, 223 F. Supp. 2d 795 (W.D. Tex. 2002).
Workman v. Kijakazi (D. Maryland 2023).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(c) — 10 cases
Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 245 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2001). ““Residual functional capacity” (RFC) is defined as “what [the claimant] can still do” despite his or her “physical or mental limitations,” see 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a). The ALJ determined that Mr.”
Walton v. Astrue, 773 F. Supp. 2d 742 (N.D. Ohio 2011).
Workman v. Kijakazi (D. Maryland 2023).
Kosanke v. Saul (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Combs v. Saul (E.D. Mo. 2022).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(d) — 5 cases
Herrmann v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 317 F. Supp. 3d 900 (N.D. Miss. 2018).
Wisnesky v. Kijakazi (S.D. Cal. 2024).
Aleman v. Saul (S.D. Tex. 2021).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(e) — 5 cases
Salazar v. O'Malley (S.D. Cal. 2025).
Turner (E.D. Mo. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.