After we find that you are disabled, we must evaluate your impairment(s) from time to time to determine if you are still eligible for disability cash benefits. We call this evaluation a continuing disability review. We may begin a continuing disability review for any number of reasons including your failure to follow the provisions of the Social Security Act or these regulations. When we begin such a review, we will notify you that we are reviewing your eligibility for disability benefits, why we are reviewing your eligibility, that in medical reviews the medical improvement review standard will apply, that our review could result in the termination of your benefits, and that you have the right to submit medical and other evidence for our consideration during the continuing disability review. In doing a medical review, we will develop a complete medical history of at least the preceding 12 months in any case in which a determination is made that you are no longer under a disability. If this review shows that we should stop payment of your benefits, we will notify you in writing and give you an opportunity to appeal. In § 404.1590 we describe those events that may prompt us to review whether you continue to be disabled.
[51 FR 16825, May 7, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cappetta v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (2018)
ca2
“§ 421 (i) ; see also 20 C.F.R. § 404.1589 ("After we find that you are disabled, we must evaluate your impairment(s) from time to time to determine if you are still eligible for disability cash benefits.”
Gerald Fitschen v. Kilolo Kijakazi (2023)
ca7
“20 C.F.R. § 404.1589 . A beneficiary must continue to satisfy both medical and employment-related criteria for receipt of benefits, so the 2003 review covered the status of Fitschen’s medical and employment circumstances; the agency requested information from him on both.”
Holden v. Heckler (1984)
ohnd
“See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1589 , 416.989: After we find that you are disabled [or blind], we must determine from time to time if you are still eligible for disability cash benefits.”
Blevins v. Astrue (2011)
ca7
“Under a “continuing disability review” process that periodically evaluates whether a claimant’s impairments still qualify the claimant for benefits, see 20 C.F.R. § 404.1589 ; Johnson v. Apfel, 191 F.”
Thompson v. Saul (2021)
ilnd
“) On October 14, 2015, pursuant to “a continuing disability review” under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1589 , the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) issued a “Notice of Disability Cessation” stating that Plaintiff had experienced “medical improvement” and was no longer disabled as of…”
Ness v. Saul (2022)
ilnd
“20 C.F.R. § 404.1589 . At the initial level, the SSA found that Plaintiff had experienced medical improvement and was no longer disabled as of August 31, 2016.”
Pablo v. Saul (2022)
ilnd
“20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1589 , 416.994a. First, the Commissioner or ALJ will consider whether the claimant has experienced medical improvement since the previous determination and, if the claimant has not improved, subject to a few exceptions, the Commissioner or ALJ will find that the…”
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security (2020)
innd
“See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1589 , 416.994a. In the continuing disability review, the administration considers whether the claimant has experienced medical improvement since the previous determination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.