C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart P—Determining Disability and Blindness

20 C.F.R. § 404.1598

If you become disabled by another impairment(s)

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If a new severe impairment(s) begins in or before the month in which your last impairment(s) ends, we will find that your disability is continuing. The new impairment(s) need not be expected to last 12 months or to result in death, but it must be severe enough to keep you from doing substantial gainful activity, or severe enough so that you are still disabled under § 404.1594.

[50 FR 50136, Dec. 6, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1981–1998 · leading case: Helen AMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 736 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Helen AMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 736 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “of 52, she meets the listing for mental retardation which would make her eligible for disability benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 , Appendix 1, Part A, Section 12.”
Freda R. VAUGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Defendant-Appellee, 58 F.3d 129 (5th Cir. 1995). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1598 Subpt. P, App. 2. This contention misconstrues the record.”
Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 1998). “SSR 88-13, 1988 WL 236011 ; 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1598 , 404.1528-29, 416.”
Rivera v. Schweiker, 560 F. Supp. 1091 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). · cites it 4× “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 (12.00 A). Using these factors as guidelines to evaluate the Secretary’s decision, the record refutes the ALJ’s finding that no functional loss exists.”
Una Mae HICKS, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Appellee, 756 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir. 1985). “-01 of Appendix 2 to Subpart P following 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 . II. Before turning to the merits of the appeal, we take notice first of the Secretary’s argument about the scope and standard of review.”
Allen v. Schweiker, 546 F. Supp. 623 (N.D. Cal. 1981). · cites it 2× “Applying the grids found in 20 C.F.R. 404.1598, Appendix 2, (the “grids”), the Secretary determined that plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act at any time after the initial two year period.”
Murphy v. Heckler, 613 F. Supp. 1233 (W.D. Pa. 1985). “1569 the AU followed the vocational grid at 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 , Appendix 2, Subpart P, Table No.”
Paul ELEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 734 F.2d 724 (11th Cir. 1984). “Eley contends his chronic liver disease meets the listings in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 , Subpart P, Appendix 1, Part A, Sections 5.”
Alvarez v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 549 F. Supp. 897 (E.D. Pa. 1982). “04 of the Social Security Regulations, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 (1982) which reads: *899 12.”
Sudhop v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 580 F. Supp. 882 (E.D. Pa. 1984). “04, Functional Nonpsychotic Disorders, 1 in the Listing of Impairments, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1598 . While plaintiff may qualify as disabled under this listing, I believe a more relevant listing exists under which plaintiff is clearly disabled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.