20 C.F.R. § 404.1645
How and when we determine whether the performance accuracy standard is met
(a) How we determine performance accuracy. We determine a State agency's performance accuracy rate on the basis of decision and documentation errors identified in our review of the sample cases.
(b) Frequency of review. Title II and title XVI initial performance accuracy are monitored together on a quarterly basis. The determinations as to whether the performance accuracy threshold has been met is made at the end of each quarter each year. Quarterly State-by-State combined initial performance accuracy rates are compared to the established threshold level.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Masters v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 707 F. App'x 374 (6th Cir. 2017).
Masters v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 707 F. App'x 374 (6th Cir. 2017). “2012) (citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.1645 (a)(3)). While treating physicians’ opinions are often afforded greater weight than those of examining physicians, “a treating source’s opinion may be given little weight if it is unsupported by sufficient clinical findings and is inconsistent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.