20 C.F.R. § 404.1929
Overpayments
An agreement may not authorize the adjustment of title II benefits to recover an overpayment made under the social security system of a foreign country (see § 404.501). Where an overpayment is made under the U.S. system, the provisions in subpart F of this part will apply.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Hudon v. SSA, 2016 DNH 019 (D.N.H. 2016).
Hudon v. SSA, 2016 DNH 019 (D.N.H. 2016). “Citing authority from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Hudon argues that the ALJ committed reversable error at the second step by failing to address each of the seven factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. 404.1929(c)(3)(i)-(vii). See Mem.”
Kirby v. Astrue, 568 F. Supp. 2d 1225 (D. Colo. 2008). “It is clear from the record that the ALJ failed to consider the factors laid out in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1929 (c)(3) and SSR 96-7p.”
Harper v. Kijakazi (E.D. Mo. 2021). “(1) whether the ALJ properly applied the pain standard; (2) whether the RFC is supported by substantial evidence and by medical evidence from any physicians; and (3) whether the ALJ properly evaluated the opinion evidence Discussion Whether the ALJ properly applied the pain…”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1929(c)(3)(i) — 1 case
Hudon v. SSA, 2016 DNH 019 (D.N.H. 2016). “Citing authority from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Hudon argues that the ALJ committed reversable error at the second step by failing to address each of the seven factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. 404.1929(c)(3)(i)-(vii). See Mem.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.