20 C.F.R. § 404.360
When a child is dependent upon the insured person
One of the requirements for entitlement to child's benefits is that you be dependent upon the insured. The evidence you need to prove your dependency is determined by how you are related to the insured. To prove your dependency you may be asked to show that at a specific time you lived with the insured, that you received contributions for your support from the insured, or that the insured provided at least one-half of your support. These dependency requirements, and the time at which they must be met, are explained in §§ 404.361 through 404.365. The terms living with, contributions for support, and one-half support are defined in § 404.366.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1986–2011 · leading case: Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan, 790 F. Supp. 2d 697 (N.D. Ill. 2011).
Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan, 790 F. Supp. 2d 697 (N.D. Ill. 2011). “350 (a); 20 C.F.R. § 404.360 , According to the relevant statutory language, dependency is clearly contingent upon support.”
Steurer v. Bowen, 644 F. Supp. 701 (E.D. Mo. 1986). “§ 416 (e) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.360 , 404.361, and 404.366.”
Palomo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 579 F. Supp. 2d 84 (D.D.C. 2008). “dependent on the insured, as defined in 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.360 through 404.365; 3. unmarried; and 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.