20 C.F.R. § 404.913

Reconsideration procedures

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Case review. With the exception of the type of case described in paragraph (b) of this section, the reconsideration process consists of a case review. Under a case review procedure, we will give you and the other parties to the reconsideration an opportunity to present additional evidence to us. The official who reviews your case will then make a reconsidered determination based on all of this evidence.

(b) Disability hearing. If you have been receiving benefits based on disability and you request reconsideration of an initial or revised determination that, based on medical factors, you are not now disabled, we will give you and the other parties to the reconsideration an opportunity for a disability hearing. (See §§ 404.914 through 404.918.)

[51 FR 300, Jan. 3, 1986]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: Reliford v. Barnhart

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Reliford v. Barnhart (2006) alnd “20 CFR § 404.913 (e) (emphasis added). The importance of testimony from such sources has been recognized in this circuit.”

Gonzales v. Colvin (2014) cod “927 (a)(2), nor be considered a treating source whose opinion must be evaluated to determine whether it is entitled to controlling weight, see 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 (a). See also Social Security Ruling 06-03p, 2006 WL 2329939 at *2; Frantz v.”

Grice v. Colvin (2015) mdd “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 & 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 .”

(SS) Tara Fae Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security (2021) caed “1996)); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.913 (d), 404.1513(d). While 20 social workers are not “acceptable medical sources” for evidence of impairment, the ALJ still must 21 “provide reasons that are germane to the witness” when discounting their opinions.”

Dryer v. Saul (2021) casd “10 See 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 (categories of evidence considered in disability claims).”

McDaniel v. Saul (2019) moed “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 (d)3. “Information from these other sources cannot establish the existence of a medically determinable impairment.”

Bland v. Saul (2020) moed “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 (d)2. “Information from these 2 Several significant revisions of Social Security regulations and reports became effective recently.”

Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security (2020) prd “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 (a) (permitting submission of new evidence on reconsideration); POMS § DI 27001.”

Manning v. The Commissioner of Social Security (2025) nyed “” 20 C.F.R. § 404.913 . c. Analysis The Commissioner’s decision that recovery of Manning’s overpayment of benefits would not defeat the purpose of Title II of the Act or go against equity or good conscience was not based on any legal error and is supported by substantial…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.