20 C.F.R. § 404.920
Reconsidered determination
After you or another person requests a reconsideration, we will review the evidence we considered in making the initial determination and any other evidence we receive. We will make our determination based on the preponderance of the evidence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 69
cases (38 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Brenda A. Wind v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 133 F. App'x 684 (11th Cir. 2005).
Brenda A. Wind v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 133 F. App'x 684 (11th Cir. 2005). “1520(c), the regulation applicable for DIB benefits, and this appeal involves 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (c), the regulation applicable for SSI benefits, we have concluded that these regulations involve the same sequential evaluation process and, thus, should be analyzed in the same…”
McCoy v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 356 F. Supp. 3d 704 (S.D. Ohio 2018). “20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (a)(4). Although a dispositive finding at any step ends the ALJ's review, see Colvin v.”
Magwood v. Astrue, 594 F. Supp. 2d 557 (E.D. Pa. 2009). “The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Magwood’s major depression and alcohol abuse disorder, in remission, were not severe impairments at *559 step two in the sequential analysis as set out in 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 . 2 Magwood appealed and this Court adopted the…”
Dealy v. Heckler, 616 F. Supp. 880 (W.D. Mo. 1984). “20 C.F.R. § 404.920 Effect of a reconsidered determination.”
Magwood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 417 F. App'x 130 (3rd Cir. 2008). “The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concluded that Magwood’s mental impairment of major depression and alcohol abuse disorder, in remission, were not severe impairments at step two in the sequential analysis set out in 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 . He made this determination after…”
Bruni v. Astrue, 773 F. Supp. 2d 460 (D. Del. 2011). “The Court agrees with the Commissioner that the ALJ correctly applied the special review techniques provided for by the regulations ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (a)), based on Dr. Brandon’s psychiatric opinion.”
Romine v. Barnhart, 454 F. Supp. 2d 623 (E.D. Tex. 2006). “Under the five-step sequential analysis for initial disability determinations established in 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 , the claimant bears the burden of proof until the initial inquiry at Step 5, where the burden shifts to the Commissioner.”
Parker v. Barnhart, 431 F. Supp. 2d 665 (E.D. Tex. 2006). “20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (d) (2005); See Soc. Sec.”
Taylor ex rel. Peck v. Heckler, 738 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1984). “916 (1980) (superseded by 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (1988)). In denying the motion for reconsideration, Taylor was again advised of her appeal rights.”
Carter v. Apfel, 220 F. Supp. 2d 393 (M.D. Penn. 2000). “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 . This action was decided at the fifth step of the process when the *395 ALJ determined that, although the Plaintiff could not return to his past relevant work activity, he was not precluded from performing light work activity with certain restrictions.”
Tackett v. Chater, 897 F. Supp. 332 (E.D. Ky. 1995). “See 20 CFR 404.920(d), 416.920(d). 5. Does the claimant have any impairment or combination of impairments meeting or equalling in severity an impairment listed in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (Listing of Impairments)? If yes, the claimant is disabled.”
Herberholz v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin. (D. Or. 2021). “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.920 (a)(4) (2012). The burden of proof rests upon the claimant at steps one through four, and with the Commissioner at step five.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.920(b) — 1 case
Forbes v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (N.D. Ind. 2022).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.920(c) — 2 cases
Tucker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2020).
Sandoval v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (W.D. Wash. 2023).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.920(d) — 5 cases
Tackett v. Chater, 897 F. Supp. 332 (E.D. Ky. 1995). “See 20 CFR 404.920(d), 416.920(d). 5. Does the claimant have any impairment or combination of impairments meeting or equalling in severity an impairment listed in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (Listing of Impairments)? If yes, the claimant is disabled.”
Anderson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 722 F. Supp. 1436 (E.D. Ky. 1989).
Banks v. Apfel, 144 F. Supp. 2d 752 (E.D. Ky. 2001).
Trent v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 788 F. Supp. 939 (E.D. Ky. 1992).
McGlone v. Chater, 906 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Ky. 1995).
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.920(g) — 5 cases
Fields v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2022).
Cole v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2022).
Fallaw v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2022).
Hughes v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2022).
White v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (D.S.C. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.