C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart J—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions

20 C.F.R. § 404.922

Notice of a reconsidered determination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

We shall mail a written notice of the reconsidered determination to the parties at their last known address. We shall state the specific reasons for the determination and tell you and any other parties of the right to a hearing. If it is appropriate, we will also tell you and any other parties how to use the expedited appeals process.

[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980. Redesignated at 51 FR 302, Jan. 3, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–2015 · leading case: Pauline Ginsburg v. Elliot L. Richardson, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 436 F.2d 1146 (3rd Cir. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pauline Ginsburg v. Elliot L. Richardson, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 436 F.2d 1146 (3rd Cir. 1971). “Social Securities Regulation, 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 . 4 Thus, appellant’s failure to request withdrawal of the examiner during the hearing or in her request for review before the Appeals Council constitutes a waiver of her right to object to the conduct of the examiner.”
In re Ryan W., 76 A.3d 1049 (Md. 2013). “; 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 . The decision of the ALJ is binding unless one of the parties requests and receives review of the decision by the Appeals Council.”
Katherine Graham v. United States, 96 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1996). “110 (claimants notified of denial of personal property claims by NASA); 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 (notice of reconsidered determination of disability claim mailed to claimant by Social Security Administration); 20 C.”
Grice v. Colvin, 97 F. Supp. 3d 684 (D. Maryland 2015). “913 & 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 . If the individual does not agree with the reconsideration decision, he or she can request a hearing before an administrative law judge.”
Long v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 375 F. Supp. 2d 674 (W.D. Tenn. 2005). “Social Securities Regulation, 20 C.F.R. § 404.922 . Thus, appellant’s failure to request withdrawal of the examiner during the hearing or in her request for review before the Appeals Council constitutes a waiver of her right to object to the conduct of the examiner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.