C.F.R.
»
Title 20
» CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart J—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions
(a) Who may request a hearing. You may request a hearing if a hearing is available under § 404.930. In addition, a person who shows in writing that his or her rights may be adversely affected by the decision may request a hearing.
(b) Who are parties to a hearing. After a request for a hearing is made, you, the other parties to the initial, reconsidered, or revised determination, and any other person who shows in writing that his or her rights may be adversely affected by the hearing, are parties to the hearing. In addition, any other person may be made a party to the hearing if his or her rights may be adversely affected by the decision, and we notify the person to appear at the hearing or to present evidence supporting his or her interest.
[45 FR 52081, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 303, Jan. 3, 1986; 75 FR 39160, July 8, 2010]
Notes of Decisions
Crawford & Co. v. Apfel, 235 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000).
· cites it 9× “§ 405 , of the Social Security Act (Act) and its applicable regulations, 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.932 and 416.1432. 1 The merits of the federal law issue presented in this case are juxtaposed against the backdrop of a state statute, Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Law, Fla.”
Crawford & Co. v. Apfel, 235 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000).
· cites it 8× “§ 405 , of the Social Security Act (Act) and its applicable regulations, 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.932 and 416.1432.1 The merits of the federal law issue presented in this case are juxtaposed against the backdrop of a state statute, Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Law, Fla.”
Becker v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 895 F.2d 34 (1st Cir. 1990).
“See 20 C.F.R. § 404.932 (1989). After hearing testimony from Amy’s mother, Lisa Marcoux, from Lisa’s mother, from Raymond’s sisters, and from other relatives and acquaintances, an Administrative Law Judge decided that Amy was illegitimate, that Raymond Petit was Amy’s father,…”
Wysocki v. Sullivan, 761 F. Supp. 693 (C.D. Cal. 1991).
“” 20 C.F.R. § 404.932 (b). Plaintiff requested a “hearing” prior to the ALJ’s decision (A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.