(a) Issuing the notice. After we set the time and place of the hearing, we will mail notice of the hearing to you at your last known address, or give the notice to you by personal service, unless you have indicated in writing that you do not wish to receive this notice. We will mail or serve the notice at least 75 days before the date of the hearing.
(b) Notice information. The notice of hearing will tell you:
(1) The specific issues to be decided in your case;
(2) That you may designate a person to represent you during the proceedings;
(3) How to request that we change the time or place of your hearing;
(4) That your hearing may be dismissed if neither you nor the person you designate to act as your representative appears at your scheduled hearing without good reason under § 404.957;
(5) The time and manner(s) in which you, or any other party or witness, will appear. If we schedule you to appear in person or by agency video, as set forth in § 404.936, the notice of hearing will tell you the place of the hearing.
(6) That you must make every effort to inform us about or submit all written evidence that is not already in the record no later than 5 business days before the date of the scheduled hearing, unless you show that your circumstances meet the conditions described in § 404.935(b); and
(7) Any other information about the scheduling and conduct of your hearing.
(c) Acknowledging the notice of hearing. The notice of hearing will ask you to return a form to let us know that you received the notice. If you or your representative do not acknowledge receipt of the notice of hearing, we will attempt to contact you for an explanation. If you tell us that you did not receive the notice of hearing, an amended notice will be sent to you by certified mail.
(d) Amended notice of hearing or notice of supplemental hearing. If we need to send you an amended notice of hearing, we will mail or serve the notice at least 20 days before the date of the hearing. Similarly, if we schedule a supplemental hearing, after the initial hearing was continued by the assigned administrative law judge, we will mail or serve a notice of hearing at least 20 days before the date of the hearing.
[68 FR 5219, Feb. 3, 2003, as amended at 75 FR 39160, July 8, 2010; 78 FR 29627, May 21, 2013; 79 FR 35932, June 25, 2014; 81 FR 90993, Dec. 16, 2016; 84 FR 69306, Dec. 18, 2019; 89 FR 68362, Aug. 26, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Todd Moats v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 42 F.4th 558 (6th Cir. 2022).
“§ 406 ; 20 C.F.R. § 404.938 (b)(2). The Social Security Administration, on the other hand, has no representative before the ALJ.”
Carr v. Comm'r, SSA, 961 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2020).
“939. If Appellees’ ALJs did not list the Appointments Clause as an issue “to be decided,” Appellees needed to object and raise it.”
Lippincott v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 982 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2013).
· cites it 2× “1438 (b); 20 C.F.R. § 404.938 (b). The Social Security Administration’s Hearings, Appeals, and Litigation Law Manual (HALLEX) permits in person testimony, as well as testimony by telephone and video teleconference.”
Muhammad v. Berryhill, 381 F. Supp. 3d 462 (E.D. Pa. 2019).
“124-149); see 20 C.F.R. § 404.938 (b)(1). Muhammad could have objected to anything about the ALJ herself or her identification of the issues, to which she could have addressed his objections either in writing or at the hearing itself.”
Bradshaw v. Berryhill, 372 F. Supp. 3d 349 (E.D.N.C. 2019).
“" 20 C.F.R. § 404.938 (b) & (b)(1). Claimants must object if they disagree with the issues the ALJ lists, 20 C.”
Diane S. P. v. Berryhill, 379 F. Supp. 3d 498 (E.D. Va. 2019).
“149-54; see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.938 (b)(1) (indicating that a hearing notice must list the issues to be addressed), 416.”
Koutrakos v. Astrue, 906 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D. Conn. 2012).
“In a careful and thorough analysis, Judge Margolis concluded that the ALJ’s proceeding in that manner violated the SSA’s own regulations, printed in 20 C.F.R. § 404.938 . Section 404.938(b) provides that in cases such as this, a benefits claimant must be sent a notice of a…”
Harris v. Callahan, 11 F. Supp. 2d 880 (E.D. Tex. 1998).
“20 C.F.R. § 404.938 (emphasis added). The notice requirement applies even if the ALJ decides to consider a new issue after an initial notice is sent.”
McCoy v. Barnhart, 309 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (D. Kan. 2004).
“See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.938 (a) and 416.1438(a).”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.938(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.