20 C.F.R. § 404.993
Effect of revised determination or decision
A revised determination or decision is binding unless—
(a) You or another party to the revised determination file a written request for reconsideration or a hearing before an administrative law judge, as appropriate;
(b) You or another party to the revised decision file, as appropriate, a request for review by the Appeals Council or a hearing before an administrative law judge;
(c) The Appeals Council reviews the revised decision; or
(d) The revised determination or decision is further revised.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–1986 · leading case: Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services (1983)
“That the administrative agency does not perceive appeal to the district courts on abuse of discretion grounds as an appropriate remedy for denials of requests to reopen is indicated by the fact that no such possibility is suggested in 20 C.F.R. § 404.993 4 which lists the…”
Joseph D. BUTTERWORTH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant (1986)
“Butterworth points to 20 C.F.R. § 404.993 which indicates that a claimant can file a written request for a hearing on, or for Appeals Council review of, a revised decision, or the revised decision can be further revised.”
Cleaton v. Bowen (1986)
“20 C.F.R. § 404.993 (a) (1985). On the other hand, 20 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.