C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart J—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions

20 C.F.R. § 404.994

Time and place to request a hearing on revised determination or decision

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

You or another party to a revised determination or decision may request, as appropriate, further review or a hearing on the revision by filing a request in writing at one of our offices within 60 days after the date you receive notice of the revision. Further review or a hearing will be held on the revision according to the rules of this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Stewart v. Astrue
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stewart v. Astrue (2008) mad “Any discussion by this Court concerning benefits is not ripe until the Agency has investigated and made a decision regarding this application.”
Shird v. Astrue (2009) flmd “20 C.F.R. § 404.994 . The Regulation is clear the ALJ may reopen the hearing if he or she believes that there is evidence missing that is material to the issues.”
Brickey v. Bowen (1989) txsd “The Plaintiff has requested a remand and rehearing pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.994 to develop additional testimony and evidence to support her position.”
Cleaton v. Bowen (1986) vaed “On the other hand, 20 C.F.R. § 404.994 (1985) seems to contemplate something between a revised initial determination and a hearing.”
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security (2020) innd “20 C.F.R. § 404.994 (a)(1). If there has been medical improvement, the administration must consider whether the impairments still meet or medically or functionally equal the severity of the appropriate Listing.”
SAGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2022) njd “At step three, the ALJ must determine whether there has been medical improvement as defined in 20 C.F.R. § 404.994 (b)(1). Id. at § 404.”
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022) ohsd “4 At step three, the ALJ must determine whether there has been medical improvement as defined in 20 C.F.R. § 404.994 (b)(1). Id. at § 404.”
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security (2020) wawd “920 with 20 C.F.R. § 404.994 . 20 Under the sequential continuing disability process, the ALJ must first determine whether 21 the claimant’s impairments or combination of impairments meet or medically equal the severity 22 of an impairment listed in 20 C.”
Robbie S. v. Frank Bisignano, Social Security Commissioner (2026) ilnd “1594 (c)(3)(v); 20 CFR § 404.994 (b)(iv)(E). 3 The Commissioner agrees that state agency medical consultant Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.