20 C.F.R. § 416.110

Purpose of program

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The basic purpose underlying the supplemental security income program is to assure a minimum level of income for people who are age 65 or over, or who are blind or disabled and who do not have sufficient income and resources to maintain a standard of living at the established Federal minimum income level. The supplemental security income program replaces the financial assistance programs for the aged, blind, and disabled in the 50 States and the District of Columbia for which grants were made under the Social Security Act. Payments are financed from the general funds of the United States Treasury. Several basic principles underlie the program:

(a) Objective tests. The law provides that payments are to be made to aged, blind, and disabled people who have income and resources below specified amounts. This provides objective measurable standards for determining each person's benefits.

(b) Legal right to payments. A person's rights to supplemental security income payments—how much he gets and under what conditions—are clearly defined in the law. The area of administrative discretion is thus limited. If an applicant disagrees with the decision on his claim, he can obtain an administrative review of the decision and if still not satisfied, he may initiate court action.

(c) Protection of personal dignity. Under the Federal program, payments are made under conditions that are as protective of people's dignity as possible. No restrictions, implied or otherwise, are placed on how recipients spend the Federal payments.

(d) Nationwide uniformity of standards. The eligibility requirements and the Federal minimum income level are identical throughout the 50 States and the District of Columbia. This provides assurance of a minimum income base on which States may build supplementary payments.

(e) Incentives to work and opportunities for rehabilitation. Payment amounts are not reduced dollar-for-dollar for work income but some of an applicant's income is counted toward the eligibility limit. Thus, recipients are encouraged to work if they can. Blind and disabled recipients with vocational rehabilitation potential are referred to the appropriate State vocational rehabilitation agencies that offer rehabilitation services to enable them to enter the labor market.

(f) State supplementation and Medicaid determinations. (1) Federal supplemental security income payments lessen the variations in levels of assistance and provide a basic level of assistance throughout the nation. States are required to provide mandatory minimum State supplementary payments beginning January 1, 1974, to aged, blind, or disabled recipients of assistance for the month of December 1973 under such State's plan approved under title I, X, XIV, or XVI of the Act in order for the State to be eligible to receive title XIX funds (see subpart T of this part). These payments must be in an amount sufficient to ensure that individuals who are converted to the new program will not have their income reduced below what it was under the State program for December 1973. In addition, each State may choose to provide more than the Federal supplemental security income and/or mandatory minimum State supplementary payment to whatever extent it finds appropriate in view of the needs and resources of its citizens or it may choose to provide no more than the mandatory minimum payment where applicable. States which provide State supplementary payments can enter into agreements for Federal administration of the mandatory and optional State supplementary payments with the Federal Government paying the administrative costs. A State which elects Federal administration of its supplementation program must apply the same eligibility criteria (other than those pertaining to income) applied to determine eligibility for the Federal portion of the supplemental security income payment, except as provided in sec. 1616(c) of the Act (see subpart T of this part). There is a limitation on the amount payable to the Commissioner by a State for the amount of the supplementary payments made on its behalf for any fiscal year pursuant to the State's agreement with the Secretary. Such limitation on the amount of reimbursement is related to the State's payment levels for January 1972 and its total expenditures for calendar year 1972 for aid and assistance under the appropriate State plan(s) (see subpart T of this part).

(2) States with Medicaid eligibility requirements for the aged, blind, and disabled that are identical (except as permitted by § 416.2111) to the supplemental security income eligibility requirements may elect to have the Social Security Administration determine Medicaid eligibility under the State's program for recipients of supplemental security income and recipients of a federally administered State supplementary payment. The State would pay half of Social Security Administration's incremental administrative costs arising from carrying out the agreement.

[39 FR 28625, Aug. 9, 1974, as amended at 53 FR 12941, Apr. 20, 1988; 62 FR 38454, July 18, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 108 cases (31 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Barnes v. Department of Human Services
Barnes v. Department of Human Services (2010) miss · cites it 10× “" 20 C.F.R. § 416.110 (2009). To receive SSI benefits, Barnes was required to establish that he was disabled—as defined by the Act—and that his income and resources were below the permitted limit.”
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler (2003) scotus “Under her statutory authority, the Commissioner has read the “interest” of the beneficiary in light of the basic objectives of the Act: to provide a “minimum level of income” to children who would not “have sufficient income and resources to maintain a standard of living at the…”
Nelson v. Nelson (1990) sd · cites it 2× “Code; 20 C.F.R., Section 416.110. The amount of supplemental income an eligible individual will receive is based on his income and resources.”
Matter of O'Sullivan v. Schebilski (2016) nyappdiv “disabled and who do not have sufficient income and resources to maintain a standard of living at the established [flederal minimum income level” (20 CFR 416.110). A person receiving SSI benefits must report “events and changes in circumstances relevant to eligibility for or…”
Juanita Newman, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kenneth Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Secu (2000) ca9 · cites it 2× “1988) (citing 20 C.F.R. § 416.110 ). The benefits are meant to “supplement an individual’s other sources of income.”
Florence Paxton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1988) ca9 “20 C.F.R. § 416.110 (1988). The SSI regulations set a minimum income level below which the federal government thinks people should not have to live.”
Roberts v. Colvin (2013) txsd “20 C.F.R. § 416.110 . Eligibility for SSI is based on proof of disability and indigence.”
Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement (2000) ark “20 C.F.R. § 416.110 . Given its purposes, we find that subjecting SSI payments to state court child-support orders would do "major damage" to a clear and substantial federal interest.”
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy (2025) scotus “…maintain a standard of living at the established Federal minimum income level.” 20 CFR §416.110 (2024). We have likewise explained else- where that “[t]he SSI program establishes a federally guar- anteed minimum income for the aged, blind, and disabled.” Schweiker v. Hogan,…”
Elsenheimer v. Elsenheimer (2004) calctapp “( 20 C.F.R. § 416.110 .) “[T]he amount of income [the person has] is a major factor in deciding whether [he or she is] eligible for SSI benefits and the amount of [the] benefit.”
Whitmore v. Kenney (1993) pasuperct · cites it 2× “at 12 ; 20 C.F.R. § 416.110 (1992). Additionally, Congress took measures to insulate SSI benefits from legal process, such as garnishment and attachment, that had been granted to Social Security disability benefits.”
Singer v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1983) nysd · cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.110 (c). That right, however, is separate and distinct from the right to receive SSI benefits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.