(a) General rule. If a resource is lost, damaged, or stolen, you may receive cash to repair or replace it or the resource may be repaired or replaced for you. We do not count the cash or the repair or replacement of the resource as your income.
(b) Interest on cash for repair or replacement of a noncash resource. We do not count any interest earned on the cash you receive for repair or replacement of a noncash resource if the interest is earned within 9 months of the date you receive the cash. We can extend the 9-month period for up to an additional 9 months if we find you have good cause for not repairing or replacing the resource within the initial period. Good cause exists, for example, if you show that circumstances beyond your control prevent the repair or replacement, or contracting for the repair or replacement, of the resource within the first 9-month period.
(c) Temporary replacement of a damaged or destroyed home. In determining the amount of in-kind support and maintenance you receive (§§ 416.1130 through 416.1140), we do not count temporary housing if—
(1) Your excluded home is damaged or destroyed, and
(2) You receive the temporary housing only until your home is repaired or replaced.
Notes of Decisions
Zambardino v. Schweiker (1981)
ca3 · cites it 4×
“1 *197 On behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated New Jersey SSI recipients, she sought an order directing the Secretary to pay the amount withheld from lump sum SSI payments by reason of 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151 (a)(2). Both parties moved for summary judgment.”
Pennsylvania v. United States (1984)
ca3
“At the time the Zambardino case was initiated, the regulation at issue was codified at 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151 (a)(2) (1979). . Prior to the recent policy change by the SSA, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania could avoid the loss of the state-funded portion of AFDC payments made…”
Zambardino v. Schweiker (1981)
ca3 · cites it 3×
“Pursuant to a regulation promulgated by the Secretary, 20 C.F.R. 416.1151(a)(2) (1979), the Jersey City SSA office, in calculating Zambardino's lump sum SSI payment, deducted the AFDC benefits she had received between September 1979 and May 1980 from her retroactive entitlement.”
David R. Murray v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services (1986)
ca9
“Next, he argues that the payments were compensation for a lost resource and therefore should be excluded by virtue of 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151 (a)(1985). Third, he suggests that California law precludes inclusion of the relocation payments in the computation of those benefits funded…”
Randall v. Califano (1980)
cand · cites it 3×
“First, plaintiffs argue that the exclusion of assistance based on need supplied by an Indian tribe in 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151 excludes plaintiffs’ payments.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151(a) — 1 case
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151(a)(2) — 2 cases
Zambardino v. Schweiker (1981)
ca3
“1 *197 On behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated New Jersey SSI recipients, she sought an order directing the Secretary to pay the amount withheld from lump sum SSI payments by reason of 20 C.F.R. § 416.1151 (a)(2). Both parties moved for summary judgment.”
Zambardino v. Schweiker (1981)
ca3
“Pursuant to a regulation promulgated by the Secretary, 20 C.F.R. 416.1151(a)(2) (1979), the Jersey City SSA office, in calculating Zambardino's lump sum SSI payment, deducted the AFDC benefits she had received between September 1979 and May 1980 from her retroactive entitlement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.