C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart N—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions

20 C.F.R. § 416.1405

Effect of an initial determination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

An initial determination is binding unless you request a reconsideration within the stated time period, or we revise the initial determination.

[51 FR 305, Jan. 3, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Willis v. Sullivan, 931 F.2d 390 (6th Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Willis v. Sullivan, 931 F.2d 390 (6th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “is to request reconsiderations of this determination under 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 and 416.1407.” See Ahghazali, 867 F.”
Singer v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 566 F. Supp. 204 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1455, 416.1481, 416.”
Disabled Rights Union v. Donna E. Shalala, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., & Kenneth Kizer State of California, 40 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1994). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1409 (initial determination that benefits must be suspended, reduced, or terminated binding unless reconsideration is requested within 60 days after the date notice of the determination is received); 20 C.”
Harper v. Bowen, 813 F.2d 737 (5th Cir. 1987). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.”
Medellin v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 199 (8th Cir. 1994). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1405 ("An initial determination is binding unless you request a reconsideration within the stated time period.”
Cullivan v. Shalala, 886 F. Supp. 568 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “Although a decision rendered on a claim at each stage of the proceedings is final and binding on the parties unless they proceed to the next step in the process, the regulatory scheme provides that a “final decision” allowing judicial appeal is rendered by the Secretary for the…”
Jack C. Jeffcoat v. Sec'y of Hhs, 910 F. Supp. 1187 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.”
Walhood v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 875 F. Supp. 1278 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.”
Richard v. Sec'y of HHS, 894 F. Supp. 1045 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.”
Davis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (W.D. Tenn. 2024). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1405 . From there, if the claimant’s request for reconsideration is denied, she may appeal to the Commissioner of Social Security for a hearing before an ALJ.”
Sellers v. Soc. Sec. Admin. (N.D. Ill. 2024). “Finally, the Notice advised Plaintiff that, if she did not agree with the decision, she had 60 days to ask for an appeal, but she did not do so. The Notice was an initial determination and, because it was not appealed, became binding and is not subject to judicial review.”
Kinsley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (W.D. Wash. 2019). “See 2 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1405 , 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.