C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart N—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions

20 C.F.R. § 416.1407

Reconsideration—general

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Reconsideration is the first step in the administrative review process that we provide if you are dissatisfied with the initial determination. If you are dissatisfied with our reconsideration determination, you may request a hearing before an administrative law judge.

[51 FR 305, Jan. 3, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Bowen v. City of New York
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bowen v. City of New York (1986) scotus “…to an ALJ hearing if he requests one within 60 days of the initial determination. 20 CFR §§416.1407 , 416.1415 (1985). 3 Title 42 U. S. C. § 405 (g), provides in part: <b”
Marlane C. Pagan v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human Services (1989) cadc “20 C.F.R. § 416.1407 . Second, the claimant is entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).”
Donald Brandyburg v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services (1992) ca5 “…reconsideration within sixty days after being notified of the original determination. 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 , 416.1409(a). The SSA will provide reconsideration through either a case review, formal or informal conference, or a disability hearing. Id. § 416.1413. If still…”
Ford v. Shalala (1999) nyed “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 , .1408. The SSA is required by its regulations to notify a claimant in writing of any decision on reconsideration, “stating the specific reasons for the determination.”
Page v. Schweiker (1983) pamd “…8 See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1407 et seq. Reconsideration procedures are set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 416.1413 , and consist of case review, informal conference, and formal conference. In each of these procedures,”
Harper v. Bowen (1987) ca5 “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 to 416.1422.”
Cullivan v. Shalala (1995) txed “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 to 416.1422.”
Jack C. JEFFCOAT v. SECRETARY OF HHS (1995) txed “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 to 416.1422.”
Walhood v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1995) txed “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 to 416.1422.”
Richard v. Secretary of HHS (1995) txed “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1407 to 416.1422.”
Screeton v. Social Security Administration (2024) ared “…initial decision requiring the return of the alleged overpayment of benefits. 20 C.F.R. § 416.1407 . In the second step, Screeton should have requested an administrative hearing after the Commissioner denied his request for reconsideration. Id.; see also 20 C.F.”
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023) flmd “1402 , reconsideration, 20 C.F.R. § 416.1407 , a hearing 2 “[W]here a defendant raises a factual attack on subject matter jurisdiction, the district court may consider extrinsic evidence such as deposition testimony and affidavits.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.