C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart N—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions

20 C.F.R. § 416.1420

Reconsidered determination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

After you or another person requests a reconsideration, we will review the evidence we considered in making the initial determination and any other evidence we receive. We will make our determination based on the preponderance of the evidence. The person who makes the reconsidered determination will have had no prior involvement with the initial determination.

[73 FR 76945, Dec. 18, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1974–2022 · leading case: Lyons v. Weinberger
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lyons v. Weinberger (1974) nysd “benefits to any person receiving mandatory minimum supplementary benefits *258 until he has afforded such persons adequate advance notice of the intended action and an opportunity to contest such action at a hearing comporting with due process standards and the requirements of…”
Harper v. Bowen (1987) ca5 “20 C.F.R. § 416.1420 . After obtaining the initial and reconsidered determinations, a dissatisfied claimant may file for an evidentiary hearing before an AU.”
Cullivan v. Shalala (1995) txed “20 C.F.R. § 416.1420 . After obtaining the initial and reconsidered determinations, a dissatisfied claimant may file for an evidentiary hearing before an ALJ.”
Jack C. JEFFCOAT v. SECRETARY OF HHS (1995) txed “20 C.F.R. § 416.1420 . After obtaining the initial and reconsidered determinations, a dissatisfied claimant may file for an evidentiary hearing before an ALJ.”
Walhood v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1995) txed “20 C.F.R. § 416.1420 . After obtaining the initial and reconsidered determinations, a dissatisfied claimant may file for an evidentiary hearing before an ALJ.”
Richard v. Secretary of HHS (1995) txed “20 C.F.R. § 416.1420 . After obtaining the initial and reconsidered determinations, a dissatisfied claimant may file for an evidentiary hearing before an ALJ.”
Maher v. Mathews (1975) ded · cites it 3× “20 CFR § 416.1420 . 17 . Docket Item 2, Exhibit E.”
LOZADA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2019) pawd “20 C.F.R. §416.1420 (a). Importantly, the mere existence of a diagnosis or an abnormal reading does not equate to a severe impairment.”
FRANCIS v. BERRYHILL (2020) pawd “20 C.F.R. §416.1420 (a). The mere existence of a diagnosis or an abnormal reading does not equate to a severe impairment.”
HILE v. BERRYHILL (2020) pawd “20 C.F.R. §416.1420 (a). The mere existence of a diagnosis or an abnormal reading does not equate to a severe impairment.”
GARDNER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY (2020) pawd “20 C.F.R. §416.1420 (a). The mere existence of a diagnosis or an abnormal reading does not equate to a severe impairment.”
RAINEY v. SAUL (2020) pawd “20 C.F.R. §416.1420 (a). Importantly, the mere existence of a diagnosis or an abnormal reading does not equate to a severe impairment.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.