C.F.R.
»
Title 20
» CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart N—Determinations, Administrative Review Process, and Reopening of Determinations and Decisions
(a) You or another party may request a hearing before an administrative law judge if we have made—
(1) A reconsidered determination;
(2) A reconsideration of a revised determination of an initial or reconsidered determination that involves a suspension, reduction or termination of benefits;
(3) A revised initial determination or revised reconsidered determination that does not involve a suspension, reduction or termination of benefits; or
(4) A revised decision based on evidence not included in the record on which the prior decision was based.
(b) We will hold a hearing only if you or another party to the hearing file a written request for a hearing.
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 307, Jan. 3, 1986; 73 FR 2416, Jan. 15, 2008; 76 FR 24812, May 3, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Ibarra v. Martin O'Malley, No. 3:23-cv-01037 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023).
“25 In response to plaintiff’s December 2020 request for reasonable accommodations, ALJ 26 Lunderman determined that under HALLEX I-2-4-302 and 20 C.F.R. § 416.1430 plaintiff had “no 27 1 right to request a hearing” on this matter.”
Aychillhum v. SSI, No. 3:23-cv-01341 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2023).
“See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1430 , 416.1433. 22 Plaintiff has the burden to demonstrate the Court has jurisdiction.”
Reid v. Soc. Sec., No. 3:19-cv-00742 (M.D. La. Mar. 31, 2021).
“); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1430 (a)(1)–(4) (identifying the lower-level decisions subject to ALJ review).”
Fritz v. Kijakazi, No. 8:23-cv-00272 (D. Neb. May 7, 2024).
“1429 (explaining that under 20 C.F.R. § 416.1430 , claimant may request a hearing following a decision or determination made, such as a denial after reconsideration).”
Big Boy v. Chater, 945 F. Supp. 202 (D.S.D. 1996).
“See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1430 . Claimant then filed a timely appeal with the Appeals Council.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.