20 C.F.R. § 416.1467
Appeals Council review—general
If you or any other party is dissatisfied with the hearing decision or with the dismissal of a hearing request, you may request that the Appeals Council review that action. The Appeals Council may deny or dismiss the request for review, or it may grant the request and either issue a decision or remand the case to an administrative law judge. The Appeals Council shall notify the parties at their last known address of the action it takes.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55
cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Maria Teresa Pupo v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 17 F.4th 1054 (11th Cir. 2021).
Maria Teresa Pupo v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 17 F.4th 1054 (11th Cir. 2021). “20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1467 , 416.1468. When, as here, the claimant appeals an ALJ’s new decision after a district court remand, the claimant instead files “written exceptions” to the ALJ’s new decision.”
Mills v. Soc. Sec., 244 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001). “Mills requested review by the Appeals Council, 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 , and submitted two new pieces of evidence.”
Parks Ex Rel. D.P. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 783 F.3d 847 (11th Cir. 2015). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 . But the Appeals Council is not required to make specific findings of fact when it denies review.”
Ralph DAMATO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 945 F.2d 982 (7th Cir. 1992). “When the Appeals Council denies review in accordance with its discretion under 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 , the rationale for requiring articulation of its reasoning is absent, since the denial is not subject to judicial review — if the Appeals Council denies a request for review, the…”
Stieberger v. Heckler, 615 F. Supp. 1315 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 . The Appeals Council may consider evidence beyond that which was before the AU.”
Falge v. Apfel, 150 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 1998). “”); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 (same). 3 . Dr. Inga was one of many of Falge’s treating physicians.”
Woodsum v. Astrue, 711 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (W.D. Wash. 2010). “When the Appeals Council denies review in accordance with its discretion under 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 , the rationale for requiring articulation of its reasoning is absent, since the denial is not subject to judicial review-if the Appeals Council denies a request for review, the…”
Whitzell v. Astrue, 589 F. Supp. 2d 100 (D. Mass. 2008). “967 and 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 . In order to do so, a dissatisfied claimant must file a written request for review within a sixty day period, which starts on the day he received the decision.”
Harper v. Bowen, 813 F.2d 737 (5th Cir. 1987). “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1467 to 416.1483. The decision rendered at the initial, reconsideration, and AU stage is binding on the claimant unless further administrative review with the Appeals Council is sought within 60 days.”
Williams v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 407 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2005). “2d 80 (2000), the AC has discretion over whether to grant review of the ALJ’s decision, 20 C.F.R. § 416.1467 . 1 A claimant’s only avenue for judicial review of a denial of claimed Social Security benefits is found in 42 U.”
Cullivan v. Shalala, 886 F. Supp. 568 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1467 to 416.1483. The decision rendered at the initial, reconsideration, and ALJ stage is binding on the claimant unless further administrative review with the Appeals Council is sought within 60 days.”
Jack C. Jeffcoat v. Sec'y of Hhs, 910 F. Supp. 1187 (E.D. Tex. 1995). “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1467 to 416.1483. The decision rendered at the initial, reconsideration, and ALJ stage is binding on the claimant unless further ad *1191 ministratíve review with the Appeals Council is sought within 60 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.