20 C.F.R. § 416.1513
Mandatory use of electronic services
A representative must conduct business with us electronically at the times and in the manner we prescribe on matters for which the representative requests direct fee payment. (See § 416.1540(b)(4)).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Law v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (N.D. Ohio 2023).
Law v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (N.D. Ohio 2023). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1513 (a)(2). The ALJ is not required to defer to or give any specific evidentiary weight to a medical opinion, is not bound by the “treating physician rule,” and is not required to give a treating source controlling weight.”
Martin v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (N.D. Ohio 2023). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1513 (a)(2). The ALJ is not required to defer to or give any specific evidentiary weight to a medical opinion, is not bound by the “treating physician rule,” and is not required to give a treating source controlling weight.”
Lee v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (W.D. Okla. 2025). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1513 (a)(2). Regardless of its source, the ALJ has a duty to evaluate every medical opinion in the record.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.