C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart R—Relationship

20 C.F.R. § 416.1830

When we stop considering you and your spouse an eligible couple

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

We will stop considering you and your spouse an eligible couple, even if you both remain eligible, at the beginning of whichever of these months comes first—

(a) The calendar month after the month you stopped living with your eligible spouse, or

(b) The calendar month after the month in which your marriage ends.

[45 FR 71795, Oct. 30, 1980. Redesignated at 46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981; 46 FR 42063, Aug. 19, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 16376, Mar. 30, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1991 · leading case: Janice Sprandel v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 838 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Janice Sprandel v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 838 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “§ 1382c(b); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1830 (a)(1), unless certain events, not relevant here, occur before the expiration of the six month period.”
Smith v. Sullivan, 767 F. Supp. 186 (C.D. Ill. 1991). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1830 (a). Based upon these provisions, the AU determined that the Plaintiff and Cindy Smith were conducting themselves as a married couple and thus they were only entitled to reduced benefits.”
Sprandel v. Bowen, 679 F. Supp. 87 (D. Me. 1986). “§ 1382c(b); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1830 . During this period, their benefits as an eligible couple continued to be divided equally, pursuant to 20 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.