The benefit under this part for an eligible individual (including the eligible individual receiving benefits payable under the § 416.212 provisions) who does not have an eligible spouse, who is not subject to either benefit suspension under § 416.1325 or benefit reduction under § 416.414, and who is not a qualified individual (as defined in § 416.221) shall be payable at the rate of $5,640 per year ($470 per month) effective for the period beginning January 1, 1996. This rate is the result of a 2.6 percent cost-of-living adjustment (see § 416.405) to the December 1995 rate. For the period January 1, through December 31, 1995, the rate payable, as increased by the 2.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment, was $5,496 per year ($458 per month). For the period January 1, through December 31, 1994, the rate payable, as increased by the 2.6 percent cost-of-living adjustment, was $5,352 per year ($446 per month). The monthly rate is reduced by the amount of the individual's income which is not excluded pursuant to subpart K of this part.
[61 FR 10278, Mar. 13, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
13
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case:
Grant v. Sullivan
Grant v. Sullivan (1990)
pamd
“The minimum monthly Supplemental Security Income disability payment, with no other income which was required to be considered, was $368 per month for 1989, 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 , and will be increased to $386 per month, effective January 1, 1990.”
Vapne v. Apfel (2002)
ca2
“The regulations similarly provide that an eligible individual, who does not have an eligible spouse and, therefore, cannot be classified as part of a “couple,” should be paid $5,640 per year, or $470 per month, in SSI benefits, see 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 , and an eligible couple…”
Smith v. Shalala (1993)
ca7 · cites it 2×
“Under 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.410 and 416.412 (1993), the amount of benefits granted depends upon the marital status of the individuals seeking assistance.”
Smith v. Sullivan (1991)
ilcd · cites it 2×
“See 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 ; 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 ; 20 C.”
Ruppert v. Bowen (1989)
ca2
“The benefit in 1986 was $336 per month, 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 , although the benefit is subject to cost-of-living increases, 42 U.”
Pamela Kay Humphries v. Robert Brian Buchanan (2024)
vactapp · cites it 2×
“1100 ; see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.410 (“The monthly rate [of benefits received] is reduced by the amount of the individual’s income which is not excluded” from income by the regulations.”
Sasaki v. Kijakazi (2022)
hid
“§§ 1320a-6, 1382; 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.410 , 416.420. Plaintiff does not dispute the correctness of the calculation of his benefits based on income.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.