C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart E—Payment of Benefits, Overpayments, and Underpayments

20 C.F.R. § 416.525

Reimbursement to States for interim assistance payments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding § 416.542, the Social Security Administration may, in accordance with the provisions of subpart S of this part, withhold supplemental security income benefits due with respect to an individual and may pay to a State (or political subdivision thereof, if agreed to by the Social Security Administration and the State) from the benefits withheld, an amount sufficient to reimburse the State (or political subdivision) for interim assistance furnished on behalf of the individual.

[41 FR 20872, May 21, 1976]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2022 · leading case: Sally A. MCLELLAN v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Larimer County Department of Human Services
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sally A. MCLELLAN v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Larimer County Department of Human Services (2022) coloctapp · cites it 2× “¶ 20 Under 20 C.F.R. § 416.525 , the SSA may "withhold [SSI] benefits due with respect to an individual and may pay to a State .”
Cherry v. Barnhart (2004) oknd “§§ 405 (a) and 1383(d)(1). Pursuant to this authority, the SSA has determined a listing of impairments in 20 CFR pt.”
Carlisi v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1984) mied “20 C.F.R. § 416.525 provides that the Secretary may withhold SSI benefits due a claimant and pay them to a state which provided interim assistance.”
Kovar v. Heckler (1985) ohnd “9 Since the Secretary can withhold prospective SSI benefits to reimburse a state providing interim assistance, 20 C.F.R. § 416.525 (1985), the Secretary could have paid the Title II benefits initially and withheld benefits from later SSI payments to ¡compensate Cuyahoga County.”
Oregon v. Barnhart (2002) ca9 “§ 1383 (g) and 20 C.F.R. § 416.525 . We affirm. Claimant first argued that the ALJ erred in finding her not credible.”
Estate of Olson v. Massanari (2001) ca9 “§ 1383 (g); 20 C.F.R. § 416.525 . That may be so, but Olson’s estate cannot claim standing on behalf of the State, and the State is not a party to this proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.