20 C.F.R. § 416.909
How long the impairment must last
Unless your impairment is expected to result in death, it must have lasted or must be expected to last for a continuous period of at least 12 months. We call this the duration requirement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 224
cases (148 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Stephens v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 323 (7th Cir. 2018).
Stephens v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 323 (7th Cir. 2018). “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 ("Unless your impairment is expected to result in death, it must have lasted or must be expected to last for a continuous period of at least 12 months.”
Douglas GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 745 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1984). “1509 ; 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . 5. Does the claimant have any impairment or combination of impairments meeting or equalling in severity an impairment listed in 20 C.”
Socobasin v. Astrue, 882 F. Supp. 2d 137 (D. Me. 2012). “See id. at 215, 227. The administrative law judge made no finding regarding the duration requirement, see id.”
Delaware River & Bay Auth. v. Kopacz, 584 F.3d 622 (3rd Cir. 2009). “; 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 ; and that his impairment precludes performance not only of his former job but also of any work "existing in significant numbers in the national economy," including "basic work activities.”
Johnny Parks v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 413 F. App'x 856 (6th Cir. 2011). “1505 ; see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . Further, Dr. Boll noted in December 2005 that after his unsuccessful return to work, Parks’s cardiologist (presumably Dr.”
Keith Cronin v. Andrew Saul, 945 F.3d 1062 (8th Cir. 2019). “Cronin takes issue with the fact that the ALJ did not actually consider intellectual disorder listing 12.”
Wells v. Colvin, 87 F. Supp. 3d 421 (W.D.N.Y. 2015). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . The record shows that Plaintiff complained of abdominal symptoms from November 30, 2010, through January 11, 2011, and again in January 25, 2012.”
Jackson Ex Rel. K.J. v. Astrue, 734 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (N.D. Ga. 2010). “20 C.F.R. §§ 416.909 (duration requirement); § 416.”
Roberts v. Shalala, 66 F.3d 179 (9th Cir. 1995). “§ 1382c(a)(3)(A); see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . The claimant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case of disability.”
Lehman v. Astrue, 931 F. Supp. 2d 682 (D. Maryland 2013). “20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . Here, the ALJ found that through the date last insured, plaintiff had the following severe impairments: (1) Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease status post fusion (2) Cardiovascular and Peripheral Vascular Diseases with hypertension status post stenting, (3)…”
Smith v. Colvin, 9 F. Supp. 3d 875 (E.D. Wis. 2014). “meets the duration requirement set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 , then the claimant is disabled.”
Meyers v. Heckler, 625 F. Supp. 228 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “1509 ; 20 C.F.R. § 416.909 . 5. Does the claimant have any impairment or combination of impairments meeting or equalling in severity an impairment listed in 20 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.