20 C.F.R. § 416.914
When we will purchase existing evidence
We need specific medical evidence to determine whether you are disabled or blind. We will pay for the medical evidence we request, if there is a charge. We will also be responsible for the cost of medical evidence we ask you to get.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: Benko v. Schweiker
Benko v. Schweiker (1982)
“, 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.914 , 416.917(b). It must be predicated on some factor inherent in the disease, rather than in the administration process.”
Fleming v. Barnhart (2003)
“20 C.F.R. §§ 416.914 , 416.917. While a lack of representation by counsel is not by itself an indication that a hearing was not full and fair, the ALJ has a heightened duty in cases involving unrepresented claimants, as in this case, to develop the factual record.”
Jackson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner (2022)
“The ALJ applied the three-step sequential disability evaluation standard for individuals under the age of 18 (see 20 C.F.R. § 416.914 (a)). Doc. 14-3 at 13–16.”
Hall v. Berryhill (2019)
“20 C.F.R. § 416.914 . “[T]he ALJ has a duty to explore all relevant facts and inquire into issues necessary for adequate development of the record and cannot rely on the evidence submitted .”
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
“, 20 C.F.R. § 416.914 (“We need specific medical evidence to determine whether you are disabled or blind.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.