20 C.F.R. § 416.932
When presumptive payments begin and end
We may make payments to you on the basis of presumptive disability or presumptive blindness before we make a formal determination about your disability or blindness. The payments can not be made for more than 6 months. They start for a period of not more than 6 months beginning in the month we make the presumptive disability or presumptive blindness finding. The payments end the earliest of—
(a) The month in which we make a formal finding on whether or not you are disabled or blind;
(b) The month for which we make the sixth monthly payment based on presumptive disability or presumptive blindness to you; or
(c) The month in which you no longer meet one of the other eligibility requirements (e.g., your income exceeds the limits).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–1987 · leading case: Lloyd Thompson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 665 F.2d 936 (9th Cir. 1982).
Lloyd Thompson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 665 F.2d 936 (9th Cir. 1982). “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.932 (a) (1980) (revised *940 and recodified 1981).”
Ruppert v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 671 F. Supp. 151 (E.D.N.Y 1987). “973 (c) (1986) (formerly codified at 20 C.F.R. § 416.932 (c) (1980)), letters from Lisa Volpe of the Contemporary Guidance Services indicate that the goal of Ruppert’s training was not competitive employment, of which she was not capable, but rather simply that she be able to…”
Bertha M. Brenner v. Richard Schweiker, Sec'y of Dep't of Health & Human Servs. of the United States, 711 F.2d 96 (8th Cir. 1983). “973 (c) (1983) (formerly codified at 20 C.F.R. § 416.932 (e) (1980)) provides: (c) If your work is done under special conditions.”
Boulton v. Harris, 518 F. Supp. 828 (D. Utah 1981). “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.932 (1980). The court holds that the finding of the ALJ that “[cjlaimant has demonstrated an ability to engage in substantial gainful work,” R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.