20 C.F.R. § 416.933

How we make a finding of presumptive disability or presumptive blindness

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

We may make a finding of presumptive disability or presumptive blindness if the evidence available at the time we make the presumptive disability or presumptive blindness finding reflects a high degree of probability that you are disabled or blind. In the case of readily observable impairments (e.g., total blindness), we will find that you are disabled or blind for purposes of this section without medical or other evidence. For other impairments, a finding of disability or blindness must be based on medical evidence or other information that, though not sufficient for a formal determination of disability or blindness, is sufficient for us to find that there is a high degree of probability that you are disabled or blind. For example, for claims involving the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the Social Security Field Office may make a finding of presumptive disability if your medical source provides us with information that confirms that your disease manifestations meet the severity of listing-level criteria for HIV. Of course, regardless of the specific HIV manifestations, the State agency may make a finding of presumptive disability if the medical evidence or other information reflects a high degree of probability that you are disabled.

[58 FR 36063, July 2, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 58046, Nov. 19, 2001]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: Dunn v. Colvin, 973 F. Supp. 2d 630 (W.D. Va. 2013).
Dunn v. Colvin, 973 F. Supp. 2d 630 (W.D. Va. 2013). · cites it 2× “26; 20 C.F.R. § 416.933 (c). Plaintiff claims his disability began on March 30, 2006, due to problems with his legs (from peripheral artery disease), lower back, and memory.”
Kirk v. Astrue, 723 F. Supp. 2d 693 (D. Del. 2010). “’s decision, Plaintiff was forty-one years old and defined as a “younger person” under 20 C.F.R. 416.933(c). (Tr. 28, 573-574). Plaintiff has an eighth grade education and no past relevant work.”
Baylor v. Berryhill (D. Nev. 2020). “20 C.F.R. § 416.933 (e)[.]” Id. (internal 15 citation omitted).”
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.933(c) — 1 case
Kirk v. Astrue, 723 F. Supp. 2d 693 (D. Del. 2010). “’s decision, Plaintiff was forty-one years old and defined as a “younger person” under 20 C.F.R. 416.933(c). (Tr. 28, 573-574). Plaintiff has an eighth grade education and no past relevant work.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.