C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart I—Determining Disability and Blindness

20 C.F.R. § 416.987

Disability redeterminations for individuals who attain age 18

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Who is affected by this section? (1) We must redetermine your eligibility if you are eligible for SSI disability benefits and:

(i) You are at least 18 years old; and

(ii) You became eligible for SSI disability benefits as a child (i.e., before you attained age 18); and

(iii) You were eligible for such benefits for the month before the month in which you attained age 18.

(2) We may find that you are not now disabled even though we previously found that you were disabled.

(b) What are the rules for age-18 redeterminations? When we redetermine your eligibility, we will use the rules for adults (individuals age 18 or older) who file new applications explained in § 416.920(c) through (h). We will not use the rule in § 416.920(b) for people who are doing substantial gainful activity, and we will not use the rules in § 416.994 for determining whether disability continues. If you are working and we find that you are disabled under § 416.920(d) or (g), we will apply the rules in §§ 416.260ff.

(c) When will my eligibility be redetermined? We will redetermine your eligibility either during the 1-year period beginning on your 18th birthday or, in lieu of a continuing disability review, whenever we determine that your case is subject to redetermination under the Act.

(d) Will I be notified?—(1) We will notify you in writing before we begin your disability redetermination. We will tell you:

(i) That we are redetermining your eligibility for payments;

(ii) Why we are redetermining your eligibility;

(iii) Which disability rules we will apply;

(iv) That our review could result in a finding that your SSI payments based on disability could be terminated;

(v) That you have the right to submit medical and other evidence for our consideration during the redetermination; and

(vi) That we will notify you of our determination, your right to appeal the determination, and your right to request continuation of benefits during appeal.

(2) We will notify you in writing of the results of the disability redetermination. The notice will tell you what our determination is, the reasons for our determination, and your right to request reconsideration of the determination. If our determination shows that we should stop your SSI payments based on disability, the notice will also tell you of your right to request that your benefits continue during any appeal. Our initial disability redetermination will be binding unless you request a reconsideration within the stated time period or we revise the initial determination.

(e) When will we find that your disability ended? If we find that you are not disabled, we will find that your disability ended in the earliest of:

(1) The month the evidence shows that you are not disabled under the rules in this section, but not earlier than the month in which we mail you a notice saying that you are not disabled.

(2) The first month in which you failed without good cause to follow prescribed treatment under the rules in § 416.930.

(3) The first month in which you failed without good cause to do what we asked. Section 416.1411 explains the factors we will consider and how we will determine generally whether you have good cause for failure to cooperate. In addition, § 416.918 discusses how we determine whether you have good cause for failing to attend a consultative examination.

[65 FR 54789, Sept. 11, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 36508, June 24, 2005; 77 FR 43495, July 25, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78 cases (55 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: Stephanie Garcia v. Comm. of Social Security
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stephanie Garcia v. Comm. of Social Security (2014) ca9 · cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). At the fourth step, the ALJ would have considered Garcia’s past relevant work, id.”
Faint v. Colvin (2014) moed · cites it 5× “20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . The rules used for these “age-18 redeterminations” are those applicable to adult claimants who file new applications for benefits, that is, the rules set out in 20 C.”
Torres-Pagan v. Berryhill (2018) ca1 · cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . In 2013, soon *56 after Torres-Pagán turned 18, the Commissioner began a re-determination process to evaluate whether his SSI benefits were still necessitated.”
Santos v. Astrue (2010) nysd “20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . Furthermore, an adult individual may be found disabled “only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage…”
Nathanial Stone v. Commissioner of Social Security (2014) ca11 “20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (a) (explaining eligibility for SSI benefits must be redetermined when a claimant reaches age 18, and that an adult claimant may be found to be not disabled, despite having been eligible for SSI benefits as a child).”
Dake v. Saul (2020) waed · cites it 5× “20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . The 12 Commissioner has established a multi-step sequential evaluation process for 13 determining whether a person’s disability has ended.”
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner (2020) alnd · cites it 3× “) See 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). Then, the ALJ determined that, since April 1, 2016, Williams’s “asthma; cervicalgia; borderline intellectual functioning; generalized anxiety disorder; and depressive disorder” are considered “severe” based on the requirements set forth in the…”
Richey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner (2022) alnd · cites it 3× “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). The second step requires the evaluator to consider the combined severity of the plaintiff’s medically determinable physical and mental impairments (“MDI”).”
Jackson v. Social Security Administration (2019) ilnd · cites it 3× “§ 1382c(a)(3)(A); 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). Some people have medical problems but are still able to work.”
Johnson v. Kijakazi (2023) ilnd · cites it 3× “§ 1382c(a)(3)(H)(iii); 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . At the initial level, Plaintiff was determined to no longer be disabled as of February 1, 2018.”
Lilibeth G. v. Kijakazi (2021) rid · cites it 3× “§ 1382c(a)(3)(H)(iii); 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 . The same rules that apply to new adult disability applications apply to an Age-18-Redetermination, except for the provisions pertaining to substantial gainful activity.”
Kirchbaum v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024) ohnd · cites it 3× “20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). The claimant bears the ultimate burden of producing sufficient evidence to prove that she is disabled and, thus, entitled to benefits.”
Show all 78 citing cases →
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.987(a)(1)(i) — 1 case
Goad v. Commissioner of Social Security (2021) nynd
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.987(b) — 6 cases
FOSTER v. KIJAKAZI (2022) insd
HICKS v. KIJAKAZI (2021) ncmd
Adeyemi v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022) nyed
Garcia v. Kijakazi (2023) nyed
KOLBERG v. KIJAKAZI (2021) ncmd
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.987(c) — 1 case
Jackson v. Social Security Administration (2019) ilnd “§ 1382c(a)(3)(A); 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). Some people have medical problems but are still able to work.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.987(e) — 7 cases
Richey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner (2022) alnd “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.987 (b). The second step requires the evaluator to consider the combined severity of the plaintiff’s medically determinable physical and mental impairments (“MDI”).”
Bruno v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022) innd
Carroll v. Social Security Administration (2023) nmd
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022) ohsd
STELLAR v. O'MALLEY (2024) paed
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.