This part applies to all State laws approved by the Secretary under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (section 3304 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. section 3304), to the administration of the State laws, and to any Federal unemployment benefit and allowance program administered by the State unemployment compensation agencies under agreements between the States and the Secretary. QC is a requirement for all States, initially being applicable to the largest permanently authorized programs (regular UC including Combined-Wage-Claims) and federally-funded programs (Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees). Other elements of the QC program (e.g., interstate, extended benefit programs, benefit denials, and revenue collections) will be phased in under a schedule determined by the Department in consultation with State agencies.
[52 FR 33528, Sept. 3, 1987, as amended at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Barez, 458 U.S. 592 (1982).
· cites it 2× “20 CFR § 602.2 (c) (1981). If local workers are not available, a "clearance order" is sent through the Employment and Training Administration of the Department of Labor to other state agencies in order to give them an opportunity to meet the request.”
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Dep't of Emp., 362 P.2d 487 (Cal. 1961).
· cites it 3× “” ( 20 C.F.R. § 602.2 (b) (Supp. I960).) The operation of an efficient employment service obviously requires the formulation of reasonable referral standards so that prospective employees may be referred to jobs for which they are suited and which are suitable to them.”
Rios v. Marshall, 530 F. Supp. 351 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
“20 C.F.R. §§ 602.2 (c) and (d). Workers recruited through the state agencies, whether intrastate or interstate, are protected by a series of regulations prescribing minimum working and living conditions, including free housing, transportation and daily subsistence from the place…”
Jenkins v. S & a Chaissan & Sons, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 216 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
“20 C.F.R. § 602.2 (a) (1977). Generally, before a request for workers, commonly known as a “job” or “clearance” order, can be sent through the interstate facilities of the USTES system, the employer and the state agency within the employer’s state must each attempt to secure…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scott Paper Co., 440 F.2d 625 (1st Cir. 1971).
“But this ignores the facts that American members in the bargaining unit would have shared in the decision; that, if successful, a strike would in the long term inure to the advantage of all employees; and that if woodsmen’s wages were to increase significantly, the jobs might…”
— 20 C.F.R. § 602.2(b) — 1 case
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Dep't of Emp., 362 P.2d 487 (Cal. 1961).
“” ( 20 C.F.R. § 602.2 (b) (Supp. I960).) The operation of an efficient employment service obviously requires the formulation of reasonable referral standards so that prospective employees may be referred to jobs for which they are suited and which are suitable to them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.