20 C.F.R. § 640.4

Standard for conformity

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A State law will satisfy the requirement of section 303(a)(1), if it contains a provision requiring, or which is construed to require, such methods of administration as will reasonably insure the full payment of unemployment benefits to eligible claimants with the greatest promptness that is administratively feasible.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1976–2013 · leading case: Acosta v. Brown, 213 Cal. App. 4th 234 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Acosta v. Brown, 213 Cal. App. 4th 234 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “) With respect to enforcement, the implementing regulations provide that “when a State agency fails, for an extended period,” to meet the timeliness standards and criteria specified in the pertinent federal regulations ( 20 C.F.R. §§ 640.4 , 640.5 (2012)), the DOL “shall pursue…”

Sylvester Burtton, Cross-Appellees v. Donald A. Johnson, Cross-Appellants, & John T. Dunlop, 538 F.2d 765 (7th Cir. 1976). “9559 (March 5, 1976), requires that states provide methods of administration which “will reasonably insure the full payment of employment compensation to eligible claimants with the greatest promptness that is administratively feasible.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.